Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #409589
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: BOOM! |
| Date | 2017-04-19 20:03 +0000 |
| Organization | O.W.L. |
| Message-ID | <azjc003g.abu@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <od3isf$n13$6@dont-email.me> <57cfe7f9-4994-411a-b8d0-fbfdc5f5ec93@googlegroups.com> <od7p8i$ln6$3@dont-email.me> <d78d8e41-a4c1-4ddb-b4b4-565d56a4263e@googlegroups.com> <od89k7$j01$2@dont-email.me> |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 4/19/2017 10:48 AM, fr314159@gmail.com wrote: >> On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 9:41:36 AM UTC-4, DFS wrote: >> >>> >>> This site https://www.python.org/doc/essays/comparisons/ makes a >>> grandiose claim: "Anecdotal evidence suggests that one Python programmer >>> can finish in two months what two C++ programmers can't complete in a >>> year." >>> >> >> But since the Python code will require 12 months to execute >> whereas the C++ code will be terminate in about 2 seconds >> C++ still comes out WAY ahead. > > For the most part, the speed gain from C will never offset the > additional development time and cost vs python. > > Obviously, this depends on the application. > > You snipped the 40 lines of python I wrote (to lookup a Usenet article > by number or messageID). It took me no time. Try duplicating it in C > and let me know when you give up. > Just grab some template socket client code and modify it a bit.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-19 09:41 -0400
Re: BOOM! fr314159@gmail.com - 2017-04-19 07:48 -0700
Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-19 14:21 -0400
Re: BOOM! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 11:36 -0700
Re: BOOM! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-19 20:03 +0000
Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-19 16:24 -0400
Re: BOOM! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-19 08:37 -0700
Re: BOOM! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-19 17:50 +0000
Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-19 14:32 -0400
csiph-web