Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.mixmin.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: cc cannot help but run like a coward. Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:21:22 -0700 Lines: 49 Message-ID: References: <20120619210647.132@usenet.drumscum.be> <13exibxzjj6if$.dlg@sitting.at.this.computer> <0a278b19-7cd1-4231-91b5-0e33462114cc@googlegroups.com> <6996c5a3-db13-4dab-a0b5-c9ac84ded54b@googlegroups.com> <2a5492d5-9e00-4753-b973-f85301af9762@t8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <7fb8feb1-76b0-494c-b529-62e302564041@googlegroups.com> <0c35fa7e-3c93-42d5-9f4d-9e5212e54a70@googlegroups.com> <251fb93f-df14-4ec5-b6fd-1053bb059943@googlegroups.com> <1b2728f8-6566-43fa-ab90-dc49f0294d12@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net BWDeeikc45rlmVLizBK9TwKXltt7hyZm8dX2RBKjQ6/Kyq73bVQhwTujVbMyAvUgRC Cancel-Lock: sha1:zAqmb4yXVVqnxJd4Vnsg1PLwyjM= User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.33.0.120411 Thread-Topic: cc cannot help but run like a coward. Thread-Index: Ac1P62yCG+/wLpwr+kOi0PjMPxbpCw== X-Priority: 10 Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:115601 More stuff cc keeps running from ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Then explain how you missed the upward trend in the latter half of 2011: . Clear as day there... and even obvious in the initial data: . You have to be pretty dense to *not* see that there is an upward trend and then a downward trend in that data. And, with that data, overall there is an upward trend, but based on the last few data points clearly not fitting with the overall trend (the data is not linear), it would be absurd to use that trend line - or any *linear* trend line - as a predictive tool. Using a linear trend line is not going to work to be a good predictive tool for non-linear data. This whole time you have been just playing games - showing off your ignorance. And you know it. It is the reason you keep making excuses for avoiding questions. The three most recent: 1) For a normal distribution, how can you visually tell if the sigma lines are drawn correctly? 2) For question 1, can this placement be based on the distance from the mean to any other element on the curve - and if so, what element? 3) Given this data: , does this show a steady rate, an increase, or a decrease for the second half of 2011? There are more, of course - they are linked in my .sig - but you will *never* answer them. Even you know, cc, that you are ignorant. That is why you keep snipping. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This is not the first bit you have run from. You keep running. You know you are clueless. You know you have been busted lying and trying to seem knowledgeable about things you are not. But, hey, my stalker thinks you are just swell... eat that up! It is not as if anyone else is ever going to even pretend to be stupid enough to buy your BS. -- The indisputable facts about that absurd debate: cc being proved wrong about his stats BS: 7 simple questions cc will *never* answer: cc again pretends to be knowledgeable about things he is clueless about.