Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #707738
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Song For C.O.L.A. |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| References | (1 earlier) <10nhjvj$2vlch$2@dont-email.me> <LWYmR.734264$SpSc.241132@fx12.iad> <10nhnf4$31n9r$3@dont-email.me> <699c6b5e$6$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <10nhs7u$339cp$1@dont-email.me> |
| Date | 2026-02-24 00:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <699ced69$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> (permalink) |
On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 10:37:34 -0500, DFS wrote: > On 2/23/2026 9:59 AM, CrudeSausage wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 09:16:05 -0500, DFS wrote: >> >>> On 2/23/2026 8:50 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote: >>>> On 2/23/26 8:16 AM, DFS wrote: >>>>> On 2/22/2026 7:17 PM, Licentious Larry Piet (aka Farley Flud) wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Do you like fresh pussy? >>>>> >>>>> "fresh" as in 15 or younger? >>>>> >>>>> No. Not at all. >>>> >>>> >>>> To post that on Usenet is really dumb of Larry, it's bad enough to be >>>> a teenophile in the first place, but to be proud of it, to post >>>> publicly about it? Nutjob. >>> >>> Freaky Feeb claimed: >>> >>> * many 12 year olds are having sexual intercourse >> >> He's not wrong though. > > You're both way wrong. Consistently, people report losing their > virginity around age 17. I didn't say that all kids lost it at 12; I said that kids from broken homes do. < snip > >> But you still remember the experience and the person, even if you never >> saw her again. The fact that you regret it gives weight to the fact >> that we are all, honestly, better off waiting until marriage. > > Probably. But learning you aren't sexually compatible, after you're > married, would be a hard lesson. > > At 26 I dated a virgin woman of 26 for a short while who refused sex > before marriage. She was a good catch: attractive, smart, tall, thin, > true blonde, degree in computer engineering from a good school. But not > only was she a virgin, she barely had any interest in sex. At that age > I couldn't wait until marriage so I broke it off. Many years later saw > on Facebook she's married and has 3 extremely good-looking children. > > For her husband's sake I hope they did it more than 3x... Almost certainly. I knew a girl who didn't have interest in sex either and wanted to wait until marriage. When she did get married though, she learned how much fun sex was and felt the need to share this discovery with others. I can guarantee that her husband didn't stop getting any. >> In fact, doing so removes any power the female gender has over us since >> they always use their looks and sex appeal to manipulate us. > > There are some crazies out there. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcS_DOKUZv8 I honestly believe that this woman's opinion has been normalized and that the majority of attractive women think that way. >> Heck, we've destroyed our own societies trying to please them by giving >> them the right to vote for the most destructive political policies >> imaginable. > > LOL! > > I get the feeling you wouldn't let women vote if you had the power. I would have at the beginning of the 20th century. In fact, I probably would have fought alongside them for their right to speak their minds in elections. Now that they've caused irreversible damage through their votes, I would take it away forever. If it weren't for them, leftists would never have a chance at gaining power. Statistically speaking, it has already been shown that men overwhelmingly vote for conservative parties and that those voting for the left are women, niggers and sissies. -- CrudeSausage John 14:6 Isaiah 48:16 Pop_OS!
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Song For C.O.L.A. Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-23 00:17 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 08:16 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 08:50 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 09:16 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 09:34 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. Pete Tuttle <pmt777@yohaa.not> - 2026-02-23 10:10 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 10:14 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-02-24 00:07 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 21:30 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-02-23 14:59 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 10:37 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 10:41 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-02-24 00:14 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-23 11:07 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 11:48 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-02-23 14:53 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-23 19:55 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-02-23 14:32 -0600
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 15:42 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 06:21 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 06:26 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 11:30 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 11:42 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 19:43 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 15:04 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-24 16:00 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 16:13 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-24 16:34 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 16:47 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-02-27 08:27 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2026-02-25 00:19 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-25 10:48 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 10:50 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-25 12:41 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-02-25 17:47 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-27 20:04 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 14:37 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-26 08:24 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-02-26 16:51 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-27 07:45 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 19:14 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-26 08:27 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-26 20:10 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-02-27 14:20 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-27 09:50 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-02-27 16:57 -0600
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-27 23:18 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-02-27 09:46 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-27 18:44 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-27 15:02 -0500
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-28 02:33 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-02-27 07:32 +0000
Re: Song For C.O.L.A. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-27 07:27 -0500
csiph-web