Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: [CM] the USB killer now exists and is being mass-produced |
| Date | 2016-12-07 09:47 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrno4ffjm.m64.whynot@orphan.zombinet> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <eajqg7Fcn88U2@mid.individual.net> <o244ee$vav$2@dont-email.me> <eamlfbF35seU1@mid.individual.net> <769ihd-95e2.ln1@news.chingola.ch> <eanjd8F9nh4U1@mid.individual.net> |
with <eanjd8F9nh4U1@mid.individual.net> Sylvia Else wrote: > On 6/12/2016 7:24 PM, Paul Sture wrote: *SKIP* >> I got my first stereo receiver in 1974 and by then there was >> protection against speaker cables becoming disconnected or shorting >> out. >> >> IOW the idea is not new. *SKIP* > Still those problems happened by accident. I suppose some self-powered > USB devices might have had faults that could lead them to apply high > voltages to USB ports, but it's not very likely, Count me in (Praise RNG!), I've had (it's disassembled now) an enclosure that burned USB host on MB it was connected to. Yes, it was powered externally. > given that such faults could also be dangerous to humans. And... > The designers of the USB spec were hardly remiss in failing to realise > that someone might do it deliberately. My take is, if those "designers" could be held liable then they would care. And as usual otherwise. What makes me believe, that the manufacturer of above mentioned stereo receiver could be held liable so they mitigated risks. Well, the world was different back then. -- Torvalds' goal for Linux is very simple: World Domination Stallman's goal for GNU is even simpler: Freedom
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
[CM] the USB killer now exists and is being mass-produced RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2016-12-03 16:36 +0000
Re: [CM] the USB killer now exists and is being mass-produced Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-04 14:40 +1100
Re: [CM] the USB killer now exists and is being mass-produced Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2016-12-04 16:11 +0200
Re: [CM] the USB killer now exists and is being mass-produced Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-05 11:25 +1100
Re: [CM] the USB killer now exists and is being mass-produced The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 08:27 -0800
Re: [CM] the USB killer now exists and is being mass-produced RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2016-12-05 20:28 -0500
Re: [CM] the USB killer now exists and is being mass-produced Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-06 13:18 +1100
Re: [CM] the USB killer now exists and is being mass-produced Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2016-12-06 09:24 +0100
Re: [CM] the USB killer now exists and is being mass-produced Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-06 21:49 +1100
Re: [CM] the USB killer now exists and is being mass-produced Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2016-12-07 09:47 +0200
Re: [CM] the USB killer now exists and is being mass-produced Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-12-07 18:56 +0000
csiph-web