Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc, alt.privacy |
| Subject | Re: Carnegie Mellon researchers bribed to crack TOR |
| Date | 2015-11-17 09:18 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <davv5hFsgdkU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <dall5hF8obrU1@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 2015-11-13 11:26:25 +0300, RS Wood said: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/11/12/fbi_paid_bounty_to_hack_tor_project/ > > This claim is almost hard to believe. > Should've seen this one coming, then: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/11/17/milliondollar_hole_in_fbi_tor_story/ //--clip It was a single line, but one that is now being used to put a question mark over the entire story. We have been told that the payment to CMU was at least $1 million. The fact that the FBI was using information gleaned from a "university-based research institute" – according to court documents – to identify and prosecute individual users was a significant story worthy of further investigation. But a financial connection, a quid pro quo, is something else entirely. And that was made plain from the sudden explosion of stories – ours included – focused on the payment. Suddenly Carnegie-Mellon goes from a research institute that may have assisted in taking down some unsavory characters (a drug pusher and a viewer of child abuse images) to one paid to do the federal government's dirty work. Where did Dingledine get his $1m figure? We've asked him and are waiting to hear back. But a few days ago, he told WiReD it was from "friends in the security community." Which is exactly the sort of vague response that would get a news story spiked. The figure has been leapt on by Carnegie Mellon and the FBI. "I'm not aware of any payment," the university's press person told WiReD. "I'd like to see the substantiation for their claim." We subsequently followed up with Carnegie Mellon, which told us that it was not commenting on the "accusations." Likewise, the FBI. A spokesman told Ars Technica that the story was "inaccurate" while not going into any detail about what exactly was inaccurate – the reports, the use of Carnegie Mellon information, the payment, or the exact payment amount. Again, we followed up. Again, the FBI will not speak on the record. But it did make plain that it is the payment – any payment – that the FBI is questioning. And here's where things get messy. //--clip
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Carnegie Mellon researchers bribed to crack TOR RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-11-13 11:26 +0300 Re: Carnegie Mellon researchers bribed to crack TOR RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-11-17 09:18 +0300
csiph-web