Path: csiph.com!au2pb.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.informatik.hu-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Santo Brown" Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.misc Subject: Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:44:20 +1000 Lines: 44 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net jA3AfCe/1BUT7t4ctRJDjAEaAYWyE4N/3GMUaN/b0d1l05AYM= Cancel-Lock: sha1:s0CECBBA1GFIWgyiT2vTp2OnxNk= In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 Xref: csiph.com alt.folklore.computers:150274 comp.misc:8478 "Huge" wrote in message news:d405tfFeaa7U4@mid.individual.net... > On 2015-08-23, Santo Brown wrote: >> >> >> "Huge" wrote in message >> news:d3urm7F528oU2@mid.individual.net... >>> On 2015-08-23, Santo Brown wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Osmium" wrote in message >>>> news:d3uhhnF2hsmU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>> "Walter Banks" wrote: >>>>> >>>>> WRT gates and Jobs >>>>> >>>>>> Neither were in the position to force customers to use their product. >>>>>> They didn't sell products based on price alone. Sales volume is an >>>>>> interesting way to keep score. They both have had products that were >>>>>> widely copied. Why do people buy their products then? >>>>> >>>>> Remind me which products of Gates was widely copied? >>>> >>>> The Win UI is widely copied in linux distros. >>> >>> Irrelevant, given that it's all copied from Xerox PARC. >> >> The Win UI that is widely copied in linux >> distros is nothing like what Xerox PARC had. >> >> It was much closer to the Mac UI. > > I would be prepared to wager that there are very few people on this 'froup > who actually worked with the Xerox Star. I'm one of them. You don’t have to work on it personally to see a comparison of the detail of the UIs. > And I'm afraid you're very wrong. Not with the look and feel.