Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: D <nospam@example.net>
Newsgroups: comp.misc,alt.fan.usenet
Subject: Re: If you were to design a netnews protocol today...
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 21:43:50 +0200
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <cc27102d-7dc7-e0cf-8d76-6be5c51d3792@example.net>
References: <v900h1$2eak$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v9qda4$1uk3c$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2927544"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M";
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <v9qda4$1uk3c$1@dont-email.me>
Xref: csiph.com comp.misc:25540 alt.fan.usenet:893



On Sat, 17 Aug 2024, Andy K. wrote:

> On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 14:32:01 -0000 (UTC)
> George Musk wrote:
>
>> Just a thought experiment:
>> if you could/had to make something like a NNTP 2.0 (with no need for
>> backwards compatibility) and server and client software for it today, what
>> would it be like?
>> In terms of specifications, technologies used, user interface, etc.
>
> Not for nothing, but Secure Scuttlebutt is a pretty cool "next gen
> NNTP" option.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Scuttlebutt
>

Long time since I heard about it, but doesn't it have scaling problems?