Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Re: AI: The New Aesthetics of Fascism
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 09:09:55 -0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <87a59t2ijw.fsf@example.com>
References: <vq1vbg$rckn$1@dont-email.me> <874j03b44e.fsf@example.com> <20250310115522.8eaad5f4c08119d7097cb6de@g{oogle}mail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:09:56 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="284b53354082a8681c403d325df2439b"; logging-data="1405261"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/KwUfVmhtSxUE32CqaQQVDoJf4xw1jt6U="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:I01S0uk5OHFT8RTtMMPd1FfYhrY= sha1:rSuZOgxpj1Pjfr7Mn2OAWWzQaC8=
Xref: csiph.com comp.misc:26869

Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> writes:

> Salvador Mirzo:
>
>> Ben Collver:
>>
>> <https://newsocialist.org.uk/transmissions/ai-the-new-aesthetics-of-fascism/>
>>
>> Pretty interesting if it's correct.  (I'll keep that in
>> mind.)  Why would that be correct?  Is it that the ring
>> wing is so narcissistic that they hate the rejection?
>> (Have I misunderstood the entire essay?)
>
> I think his main point is that by destroying our aesthetics,
> they intend to destroy our ethics along with it.  Not that I
> agree that it's intentional, though, but may be still true.

And their strategy to destroy our aesthetics is to feed us a lot of
computer-generated ``art''?