Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Re: AI: The New Aesthetics of Fascism
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 18:32:17 -0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <874j03b44e.fsf@example.com>
References: <vq1vbg$rckn$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 22:32:17 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="75a784fd2388f925da5efdc23276ef78"; logging-data="357264"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18suUcbGCbevxNTWrz8AOiX2+PkOe6Pt9o="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SGxieUaJmMN8rA1iTtarP7ouY/I= sha1:DtizWXzWOO2htxmsZ05BQQAtkIc=
Xref: csiph.com comp.misc:26835

Ben Collver <bencollver@tilde.pink> writes:

> AI: The New Aesthetics of Fascism
> =================================
> February 9, 2025 
> Gareth Watkins

[...]

> Our most effective weapons against AI, and the right wing that has
> adopted it, may not be strikes, boycotts or the power of dialectics.
> They might be replying "cringe," "this sucks," and "this looks like
> shit."

Pretty interesting if it's correct.  (I'll keep that in mind.)  Why
would that be correct?  Is it that the ring wing is so narcissistic that
they hate the rejection?  (Have I misunderstood the entire essay?)

> Author: Gareth Watkins (@garethlwatkins) 
> From: <https://newsocialist.org.uk/transmissions/ai-the-new-aesthetics-of-fascism/>