Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Salvador Mirzo Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: The DOS 3.3 SYS.COM Bug Hunt Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 21:38:05 -0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: <8734g2voya.fsf@example.com> References: <20250224075243.abbf3892667a0cf1313d1441@127.0.0.1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 01:38:05 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="369613db06fa6cb53ad225042af8fb9c"; logging-data="1586770"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19qgXEd5Tuyg82DjXBnv9hqjaD2PWkfuT8=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:1zpkmgcXkJCgn/FuVtA0lGrC6Vg= sha1:DgD4H2R5ZevZnWQdLKJrwEf2gMc= Xref: csiph.com comp.misc:26657 John McCue writes: > Followups changed to: comp.misc > > In comp.misc Kerr-Mudd, John wrote: >> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 01:03:51 -0000 (UTC) >> Ben Collver wrote: >> >>> The DOS 3.3 SYS.COM Bug Hunt >>> ============================ > >>> From: >>> >> DOS_33_SYS_Bug_Hunt.html> >> >> Now I'm suffering from acute nostalgia. > > You and me both, DOS 3.3 on a 286, fun times :) I never used DOS as a programmer, so it wasn't nostalgic to me, but I enjoyed seeing how simpler things were back then and how programs like debug could help you to see what was going on. I was reading about 6502 assembly recently and I became very interested in getting closer to that simplicity. The booklet author remarked that modern x86 assembly isn't really meant for programmers, but compilers. I had never really thought of that, but it made a lot of sense to me. So maybe I should indeed look into an older, simpler machine to enjoy the low level of things.