Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.mail.uucp > #161

Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days

From John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Newsgroups comp.mail.uucp
Subject Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days
Date 2021-08-03 02:24 +0000
Organization Taughannock Networks
Message-ID <sea9d2$2fif$1@gal.iecc.com> (permalink)
References <990495f7-9d07-436a-aa49-66f1b105993cn@googlegroups.com> <se9k7q$p43$1@gal.iecc.com> <se9uv7$663$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>

Show all headers | View raw


According to Grant Taylor  <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>:
>> UUCP routing?  There was and is no such thing.  The uux command only 
>> knows how to send a command and an input file one hop.
>
>I question the veracity of that statement.  I've used uux from 
>contemporary version of Taylor UUCP (no known relation) to send commands 
>to remote systems via intermediary systems.  I've got commands like the 
>following in shell history:
>
>    $ uux 'host1!host2!uname -a > /tmp/host2-uname-uux.out'
>
>I seem to recall these commands working as desired.  My client / sending 
>system needed to send the command through host1 to be able to reach host2.

I honestly don't remember, but I am pretty sure that other than the
mail routes we got from the mapping project, you had to give the full
bang path for all of the hops. When I was using uucp, it was point to
point over dialup using Telebit modems. If anyone wants a full sized
ISA card Telebit modem, I may still have it in the junk pile.

>Maybe this is a newer capability in contemporary Taylor UUCP that didn't 
>exist in UUCP implementations of old.

Maybe.  I ditched UUCP in the mid 1980s when I got my a rather funky Internet
connection using Wavelan proto-wifi cards from an antenna in my attic to a
friend's house a block away to share his blazing fast 56Kb DDS connection.
It was still better than dialup uucp.



-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

Back to comp.mail.uucp | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> - 2021-08-01 20:52 -0700
  Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-08-02 20:23 +0000
    Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> - 2021-08-02 14:11 -0700
      Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2021-08-02 17:44 -0600
    Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2021-08-02 17:24 -0600
      Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-08-03 02:24 +0000
        Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2021-08-02 22:35 -0600
          Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days Crypto God <CryptoGod@china.com> - 2021-10-09 05:00 +0000
            Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days Avon Kerr <avon@bbs.nz.invalid> - 2021-10-13 22:02 +1300
            Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days <joe@example.invalid> - 2022-02-27 10:48 +0000

csiph-web