Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.mail.uucp > #161
| From | John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mail.uucp |
| Subject | Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days |
| Date | 2021-08-03 02:24 +0000 |
| Organization | Taughannock Networks |
| Message-ID | <sea9d2$2fif$1@gal.iecc.com> (permalink) |
| References | <990495f7-9d07-436a-aa49-66f1b105993cn@googlegroups.com> <se9k7q$p43$1@gal.iecc.com> <se9uv7$663$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> |
According to Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>: >> UUCP routing? There was and is no such thing. The uux command only >> knows how to send a command and an input file one hop. > >I question the veracity of that statement. I've used uux from >contemporary version of Taylor UUCP (no known relation) to send commands >to remote systems via intermediary systems. I've got commands like the >following in shell history: > > $ uux 'host1!host2!uname -a > /tmp/host2-uname-uux.out' > >I seem to recall these commands working as desired. My client / sending >system needed to send the command through host1 to be able to reach host2. I honestly don't remember, but I am pretty sure that other than the mail routes we got from the mapping project, you had to give the full bang path for all of the hops. When I was using uucp, it was point to point over dialup using Telebit modems. If anyone wants a full sized ISA card Telebit modem, I may still have it in the junk pile. >Maybe this is a newer capability in contemporary Taylor UUCP that didn't >exist in UUCP implementations of old. Maybe. I ditched UUCP in the mid 1980s when I got my a rather funky Internet connection using Wavelan proto-wifi cards from an antenna in my attic to a friend's house a block away to share his blazing fast 56Kb DDS connection. It was still better than dialup uucp. -- Regards, John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
Back to comp.mail.uucp | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> - 2021-08-01 20:52 -0700
Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-08-02 20:23 +0000
Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> - 2021-08-02 14:11 -0700
Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2021-08-02 17:44 -0600
Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2021-08-02 17:24 -0600
Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-08-03 02:24 +0000
Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2021-08-02 22:35 -0600
Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days Crypto God <CryptoGod@china.com> - 2021-10-09 05:00 +0000
Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days Avon Kerr <avon@bbs.nz.invalid> - 2021-10-13 22:02 +1300
Re: Question on how bang-paths worked from the old days <joe@example.invalid> - 2022-02-27 10:48 +0000
csiph-web