Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mail.uucp |
| Subject | Re: pathalias program |
| Date | 2019-09-04 08:58 -0600 |
| Organization | TNet Consulting |
| Message-ID | <qkojc9$etj$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> (permalink) |
| References | <45647e5d-1548-4df3-96bc-18f792f75fae@googlegroups.com> <a66ad127-88da-42e5-a93b-08a792ae0653@googlegroups.com> <qkjf9m$738$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <0648b954-455c-4efb-bed6-3b0746ddd062@googlegroups.com> |
On 9/3/19 12:54 PM, Radim Kolář wrote: > I know about several UUCP networks, each with 20-60 members. Interesting. I'd be interested in learning about them. > Firewalls, NAT, you have to be always online. I would think that firewalls and NAT would be overcome as part of establishing connections. Or are you implying that using things like outbound UUCP through a stateful (NATing) firewall is a non-issue for UUCP? Yes, UUCP's store-and-forward is nice. > It will be like it always was. Thank you for the link to an old map. > Nobody is forcing you to be always online, using ssh transport, > pgp encrypted rmail packets or something like that. Nothing about SMTP strictly /requires/ you to be always online. You do need /a/ receiving server to be accessible while the sending server is trying to connect. But I think the same thing can be said about UUCP. I get optionally using SSH as a transport. I'm ignorant of people using PGP, et al., to encrypt rmail packets. > Only centralised thing will be map file. You want to join - find > somebody who is willing to be connected with you, make agreement > about protocol and register uucp name at send map entry. :-) > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.mail.maps/Oj6Y2yUlMk4/nwmH6oh6JMcJ > > You can choose if you want to route mail, you dont have to, but you > need to maintain correct map entry. ACK > SOCKS client Are you wanting to add SOCKS client to the uucp binaries? What sort of connections are you supporting? Are you wanting to be able to route them through SOCKS? I'd be inclined to put the SOCKS connectivity part in other things around uucp binaries. E.g. something that presents a virtual serial port and gateways to remote TCP connections which are routed through something like TUN-to-SOCKS. STDIO is even easier. socat is a wonderful tool. Admittedly, socat supports acting as a SOCKS client. -- Grant. . . . unix || die
Back to comp.mail.uucp | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
pathalias program Radim Kolář <kolar.radim@gmail.com> - 2019-08-24 11:36 -0700
Re: pathalias program Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-08-27 15:54 -0600
Re: pathalias program Radim Kolář <kolar.radim@gmail.com> - 2019-08-27 22:33 -0700
Re: pathalias program bje@ripco.com - 2019-08-28 11:42 +0000
Re: pathalias program Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-08-28 20:25 -0600
Re: pathalias program Radim Kolář <kolar.radim@gmail.com> - 2019-08-31 23:40 -0700
Re: pathalias program Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-09-02 10:18 -0600
Re: pathalias program Radim Kolář <kolar.radim@gmail.com> - 2019-09-03 11:54 -0700
Re: pathalias program Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-09-04 08:58 -0600
Re: pathalias program Andy Valencia <vandys@vsta.org> - 2019-09-03 17:34 -0700
Re: pathalias program Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-09-04 11:01 -0600
Re: pathalias program Andy Valencia <vandys@vsta.org> - 2019-09-05 11:38 -0700
csiph-web