Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.mail.sendmail > #8231
| From | Claus Aßmann <INVALID_NO_CC_REMOVE_IF_YOU_DO_NOT_POST_ml+sendmail(-no-copies-please)@esmtp.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mail.sendmail |
| Subject | Re: Mandatory STARTTLS ? |
| Date | 2026-01-30 00:57 -0500 |
| Organization | MGT Consulting |
| Message-ID | <10lhh8q$3tp$1@news.misty.com> (permalink) |
| References | <10lgddc$1ud8$1@gal.iecc.com> |
John Levine wrote: > In the IETF last call about the SMTP applicability statement, we are > having a long argument about making STARTTLS mandatory. That is/was a mess. > The other group says there are still corner cases where plain text is > useful, e.g., dusty printers saying they're out of paper, or mail to > postmaster telling him that his cert has expired, and if you want to Or TLS versions/implementations/... incompatibilities or ... > mandate TLS on your own system, you have MTA-STS and DANE. And other options, e.g., an admin can configure sendmail that way if they think it is needed. > What do you think? Any chance sendmail would completely remove non-STARTTLS > mail? No.
Back to comp.mail.sendmail | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Mandatory STARTTLS ? John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2026-01-29 19:45 +0000 Re: Mandatory STARTTLS ? Claus Aßmann <INVALID_NO_CC_REMOVE_IF_YOU_DO_NOT_POST_ml+sendmail(-no-copies-please)@esmtp.org> - 2026-01-30 00:57 -0500 Re: Mandatory STARTTLS ? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2026-01-30 07:38 +0100
csiph-web