Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.mail.misc > #972
| From | Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mail.misc, comp.mail.sendmail |
| Subject | Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? |
| Date | 2021-01-08 08:48 +0000 |
| Organization | It is for me to know and for you to find out. |
| Message-ID | <anfi+jure5b34cf-l185@wp.eu> (permalink) |
| References | <anfi+zc457kln0f-l163@wp.eu> <rt7iq6$lt4$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <eli$2101071718@qaz.wtf> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> wrote: > In comp.mail.misc, Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> wrote: >> On 1/6/21 1:37 PM, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: >>> Is there a need for news:comp.mail.esmtp or news:comp.mail.mta ? > > Doubtful. comp.mail.misc can cover anything not covered by other > comp.mail.* groups, and comp.mail.misc gets virtually no traffic. > >> They aren't in my active file, so I can't check their history. Which is >> in and of itself strange as I thought my active file was based on the >> ISC default. > > I think Andrzej was not asking if the groups should be removed, but if > they should be added. (Or maybe he was asking if they should be removed, > but in that case: yes. Those are not official Big-8 newsgroups.) > >> I also question is there any value in removing (part of) the comp >> hierarchy? Seeing as how leaving it in the active file seems to take >> very few resources. > > It will be mean fewer places for "The Doctor" to post his Xananews > statistics posts, and fewer places for the odd other spammer to show up. > >>> Starting formal procedure would be waste of time with no interest. >> Starting a formal procedure to do what? > > I think he meant formal procedure to add those groups. I think that > indeed would be a waste of time. As for a formal procedure to remove the > groups, that shouldn't be necessary. Just apply a checkgroups message. > The big-8.org wiki points to this FTP site: > > ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/Group_Lists > > for the official list of groups. I think that short term "recommendation" may be to post some replies to news:comp.mail.misc *too*. news:comp.mail.sendmail is "more alive" and because of it receives also "much more than sendmail" question. -- [Andrew] Andrzej A. Filip
Back to comp.mail.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2021-01-07 11:06 -0700
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-07 22:27 +0000
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> - 2021-01-08 08:48 +0000
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2024-03-12 10:17 +0000
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-03-12 12:28 +0100
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-03-12 13:12 +0000
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2024-03-12 10:31 -0300
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2024-03-12 21:45 -0500
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2024-03-13 16:44 -0300
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2024-03-13 23:38 -0500
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? dbastos@ic.ufrj.br - 2024-03-14 08:12 -0300
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-03-14 13:30 +0000
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2024-03-14 21:18 -0500
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-03-15 14:20 +0000
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2024-03-15 15:54 -0500
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Johanne Fairchild <jfairchild@tudado.org> - 2024-03-19 07:40 -0300
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-03-19 13:20 +0000
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2024-03-19 08:35 -0500
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-03-19 14:45 +0000
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2024-03-19 18:32 -0500
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2024-03-19 08:26 -0500
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2024-03-19 15:46 +0000
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2024-03-13 05:56 +0000
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Eric Pozharski <apple.universe@posteo.net> - 2024-03-14 07:38 +0000
Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Sovann Pacey <spacey@vapupe.com> - 2024-03-14 08:16 -0300
csiph-web