Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.mail.misc > #1222
| From | Michael Uplawski <michael.uplawski@uplawski.eu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mail.misc |
| Subject | Re: [Outllook.com] Mail-service integration in diverse .* management systems |
| Date | 2025-07-03 19:11 +0200 |
| Organization | mediocre |
| Message-ID | <AABoZrm1x78AABno.A3.flnews@ferrat.uplawski.eu> (permalink) |
| References | <AABoX3c-OKQAAHh+.A3.flnews@kurti.uplawski.eu> <103s1c7$1l95d$1@dont-email.me> <AABoYh-F0nAAAAaJ.A3.flnews@ferrat.uplawski.eu> <1043ohb$3kbi6$1@dont-email.me> |
Doc O'Leary wrote in comp.mail.misc: >Even if I see an insurance company as needing to have a *core* technology >competence to function in the modern world, maybe they don’t see it that >way (at least not for “solved” technology problems like email). My English may fail me now, PSE excuse if my phrasing lacks precision. AFAIS, on the side of the insurance company, they consider any IT problem solved that the other company with the ‘I’ in front has declared to be responsible for. The slogan is « Excellence technologique & innovation » and then they delegate their email although mass mailings and newsletters come from their own servers. >>Do you have an advice? There was one occasion on which I considered >>suing the company in question, but hesitated long enough to finally >>calm down. This would anyway be a crusade without end… > >It really depends on the specifics of their behavior. Generally, I find >I’ll get more traction if I frame the problem as an >accessibility/accommodations issue. That is, instead of hitting them with >the exact kind of technical details I know they don’t want to hear, I go >the opposite path and just say I don’t know how to use “that fancy stuff” >and ask what other options there are. Okay. I did something similar in asking my correspondence to be directed to the “user space” on their Web application, instead of my mail address. Unfortunately, with work accidents and work-related diseases, new persons are in charge and appear to not be involved in that part of communications. Every department appears to be either comfortable with the Web-interface, authorized to use it, one of both or none. >Another reframing is to point out that the problem on their side is bigger >than just me. I had Microsoft block messages from my email server last >year for literally *no* reason: > ><https://impossiblystupid.com/node/1021/?content=microsoft's-smartscreen-embrace-extend-and-extinguish-for-email> I am having trouble accessing that URL. >It usually lights a fire under people when they realize their email >provider isn’t actually providing them legitimate business emails, or is >dumping them into a spam folder. I told everybody that they should not be surprised, if I just routinely erase their messages as they do not seem to come from the organization that they work for. >Of course, if they’re outsourcing their internal operations *anyway*, >anything you find a way to “safely” give them is still likely to be escape >their control at some point . . . Yes. As regards the insurance, my favorite solution is to take the car and talk to their staff at the counter .., 40 minutes one way. I guess we are off-topic now but the concerns are probably bigger than what my OP has covered. Cheerio Michael -- “It's not what isn't, it's what you wish was that makes unhappiness.” (Janis Joplin)
Back to comp.mail.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
[Outllook.com] Mail-service integration in diverse .* management systems Michael Uplawski <michael.uplawski@uplawski.eu> - 2025-06-28 07:01 +0200
Re: [Outllook.com] Mail-service integration in diverse .* management systems Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2025-06-28 17:58 +1000
Re: [Outllook.com] Mail-service integration in diverse .* management systems Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-06-28 11:14 +0200
Re: [Outllook.com] Mail-service integration in diverse .* management systems Michael Uplawski <michael.uplawski@uplawski.eu> - 2025-06-28 11:48 +0200
Re: [Outllook.com] Mail-service integration in diverse .* management systems Michael Uplawski <michael.uplawski@uplawski.eu> - 2025-06-28 11:49 +0200
Re: [Outllook.com] Mail-service integration in diverse .* management systems Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-06-29 18:41 +0000
Re: [Outllook.com] Mail-service integration in diverse .* management systems Michael Uplawski <michael.uplawski@uplawski.eu> - 2025-06-30 07:25 +0200
Re: [Outllook.com] Mail-service integration in diverse .* management systems Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-07-02 16:59 +0000
Re: [Outllook.com] Mail-service integration in diverse .* management systems Michael Uplawski <michael.uplawski@uplawski.eu> - 2025-07-03 19:11 +0200
Re: [Outllook.com] Mail-service integration in diverse .* management systems Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-07-04 18:12 +0000
Re: [Outllook.com] Mail-service integration in diverse .* management systems not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-07-05 10:20 +1000
Re: [Outllook.com] Mail-service integration in diverse .* management systems Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-07-06 16:20 +0000
csiph-web