Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Sovann Pacey Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc Subject: Re: comp.mail.esmtp or comp.mail.mta ? Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 08:16:59 -0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: <87plvxnjv8.fsf@vapupe.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5c251fff8f8808e4d1fd909caeacd3fd"; logging-data="1663408"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18sdQnupEMF/xCpXGWOOsBkLKwTzQf952I=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:SpjYMlr7QPXrTyUgaS3dbNPtypU= sha1:bkEJB/OOQkHUhKYTMlqSp947oVY= Xref: csiph.com comp.mail.misc:1188 Eric Pozharski writes: > with Eli the Bearded wrote: >> In comp.mail.misc, >> Tristan Wibberley >> wrote: [...] >> Browser companies decided that they don't understand FTP and were >> tired of fixing the bugs in their implementations. > > IOW, The Industry failed to invent ways to monetize it. Well said.