Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Salvador Mirzo Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc Subject: Re: mail @example.com without dns a-record for example.com Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 10:18:58 -0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: <8734iezge5.fsf@example.com> References: <878qs7wvmy.fsf@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:18:59 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d2b4fef8c65ef16b29d587cb7006c018"; logging-data="1292383"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18pVx58mcbHTRctjwiSdoSrDfCgZdgz3oY=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:EJ7UdV4N7+humY4e2btOfXnf7cM= sha1:KDD+ufTPkb4hmr6CsCzSqBwEJBo= Xref: csiph.com comp.mail.misc:1209 Claus Aßmann writes: > Salvador Mirzo wrote: > >> The objective here is just learning how things work. I asked > > You might want to read the fine RFCs, e.g., RFC 5321 > 5.1. Locating the Target Host > .... > The lookup first attempts to locate an MX record associated with the > name. [[...]] Thank you so much for the reference. >> myself---is it possible to get mail sent to someone@example.com without >> an a-record fore example.com? I think the answer should be ``yes'' > > Correct. > >> But after the deletion of the a-record example.com, I noticed Gmail > > Since you haven't given real data it's hard to say what you did > wrong. Maybe your MX record is incorrect or hasn't propagated yet. I was likely confused---I updated you all in a follow-up to John Levine.