Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.mail.headers > #8
| From | Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201210.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mail.misc, alt.comp.mail.misc, comp.mail.headers |
| Subject | Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? |
| References | <508C78EE.EAD2B0E9@Man.com> |
| Message-ID | <aed8a94a030a6235b02d71827736076b@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> (permalink) |
| Date | 2012-10-28 14:07 +0100 |
| Organization | Frell Anonymous Remailer |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> wrote: > Jorgen Grahn wrote: > > > On Sat, 2012-10-27, Solbu wrote: > > > >> I wanted to know why the firmware programmers would have used > > >> this string for their ehlo greeting > > > > > > They use it because more and more SMTP servers require a > > > HELO/EHLO greeting before they accept any email. > > > > Huh? HELO has been mandatory with SMTP since the 1980s. > > You both missed the entire point of my original question. > > So I will repeat it. > > =========== > Recently I've been trying to figure out why a Trendnet TV-IP110w > IP-camera was not able to connect to my SMTP server to send mail. > > I performed some packet analysis and found that the camera was greeting > the server with this: > > ehlo MAPI1.0 > > And my server responds with this: > > 501 Invalid domain syntax > > In looking at the ehlo specifications, the greeting is supposed to > contain something that looks like a domain-name. So I believe the > string "MAPI1.0" is being rejected by my server on that basis. > ============ > > So you see, it's not that this camera wasn't generating a "ehlo" > greeting. > > The issue is the "MAPI1.0" part of the ehlo greeting that my SMTP server > apparently doesn't like, and it doesn't seem to like it because > according to SMTP standards "MAPI1.0" is not a valid domain-name. > > Comments? Yes, you're a lamer.
Back to comp.mail.headers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-10-12 19:53 -0400
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Solbu <solbu@solbu.net.ugyldig> - 2012-10-27 03:31 +0200
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-10-27 18:06 +0000
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-10-27 20:14 -0400
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201210.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-10-28 14:07 +0100
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-10-28 12:35 -0400
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2012-10-28 20:49 +0000
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-10-29 22:08 +0000
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2012-10-28 22:17 -0400
csiph-web