X-Received: by 10.182.40.130 with SMTP id x2mr27393388obk.48.1427558765129; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:06:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.92.55 with SMTP id a52mr386964qge.16.1427558765065; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!h15no210968igd.0!news-out.google.com!q90ni547qgd.1!nntp.google.com!q107no141273qgd.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=50.133.182.63; posting-account=DW9BxAoAAADNylUQHYd1L_SeXIyfMifj NNTP-Posting-Host: 50.133.182.63 User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Request for help benchmarking rubygems From: Marc Siegel Injection-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 16:06:05 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lines: 16 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.ruby:7099 Hi ruby community, I'm writing today to ask for help benchmarking this pull request to rubygem= s: https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/1200 Here's a micro-benchmark demonstrating the improvement to their linked list= class: https://gist.github.com/ms-ati/d399abe505a5999ebabd The stumbling block to getting this merged appears to be the need for a mac= ro benchmark in the context of a real rubygems scenario which demonstrates = the performance benefit. I'm hoping someone out there knows how to set up s= uch a scenario with rubygems, and is interested in helping? Thanks, -Marc