Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
Subject: Re: "Put" in Ruby
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 01:45:19 +0200
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <dndcohFd463U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <d720c9a9-3943-45d9-83a1-ff3cf224aaef@googlegroups.com> <m2inziaeew.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net rVzfhdDTlSRA76vK31W60ARgur2D52a3Vl+79Pvdr55rJ+kIc=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NetudZ6U4lub1mkM+3Lb/N1Zla0=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
In-Reply-To: <m2inziaeew.fsf@gmail.com>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.ruby:7219

On 15.04.2016 20:57, Sebastian Christ wrote:

> irb(main):001:0> RUBY_VERSION
> => "2.3.0"
> irb(main):002:0> puts.class
>
> => NilClass
> irb(main):003:0>
>
> Looks like `puts' is an instance of NilClass. And therefore an object.

This is ridiculous - or an attempt at humor.  You invoke .class on the 
result of invoking puts - not on puts.

irb(main):001:0> method :puts
=> #<Method: Object(Kernel)#puts>
irb(main):002:0> _.owner
=> Kernel

Cheers

	robert

-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/