Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!talisker.lacave.net!lacave.net!not-for-mail From: 7stud -- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby Subject: Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:32:07 -0500 Organization: Service de news de lacave.net Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <52198c724199b47f9d59c43592238d37@ruby-forum.com> <26d555101380a80dba2c4c1f0f82ea08@ruby-forum.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bristol.highgroove.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: talisker.lacave.net 1303320807 15630 65.111.164.187 (20 Apr 2011 17:33:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@lacave.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:33:27 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: X-Received-From: This message has been automatically forwarded from the ruby-talk mailing list by a gateway at comp.lang.ruby. If it is SPAM, it did not originate at comp.lang.ruby. Please report the original sender, and not us. Thanks! For more details about this gateway, please visit: http://blog.grayproductions.net/categories/the_gateway X-Mail-Count: 381942 X-Ml-Name: ruby-talk X-Rubymirror: Yes X-Ruby-Talk: Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.ruby:3258 Stu wrote in post #993922: > There is a > tutorial online which explains haskell's monads in ruby I plan on > grokking > as well. > It's my understanding that unless you have a Phd in abstract mathematical theory and are one of the inventors of String theory(M theory in particular), you will never understand monads. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.