X-FeedAbuse: http://nntpfeed.proxad.net/abuse.pl feeded by 88.191.16.109 Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!nospam.fr.eu.org!talisker.lacave.net!lacave.net!not-for-mail From: Quintus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby Subject: Re: RubyGems 1.8 treats warnings as errors for C extensions, fails to install RedCloth? Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 15:15:12 -0500 Organization: Service de news de lacave.net Lines: 41 Message-ID: <4DCC3FC8.3060402@gmx.net> References: <4DCBB7B2.3060802@gmx.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: bristol.highgroove.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: talisker.lacave.net 1305231688 12156 65.111.164.187 (12 May 2011 20:21:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@lacave.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:21:28 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: X-Received-From: This message has been automatically forwarded from the ruby-talk mailing list by a gateway at comp.lang.ruby. If it is SPAM, it did not originate at comp.lang.ruby. Please report the original sender, and not us. Thanks! For more details about this gateway, please visit: http://blog.grayproductions.net/categories/the_gateway X-Mail-Count: 383135 X-Ml-Name: ruby-talk X-Rubymirror: Yes X-Ruby-Talk: <4DCC3FC8.3060402@gmx.net> Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.ruby:4427 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 12.05.2011 13:27, schrieb Nikolai Weibull: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:35, Quintus wrote: > >> Obviously RedCloth generates some warnings during compilation, and now >> RubyGems advises the compiler to treat them as errors > > RedCloth adds -Werror, see > > https://github.com/jgarber/redcloth/blob/master/tasks/compile.rake#L33 You're right, that's odd. Then it's a bug in RedCloth, as it's obviously supposed to build without warnings. I'll report this to the RedCloth team. Thanks. >> somedays ago RedCloth installed without problems > > It seems your environment has changed in some other way. Perhaps GCC > has been upgraded? > Indeed, last friday I upgraded several things. I'm not sure wheather or not GCC has been affected, but at least it's possible. Thanks again. Vale, Marvin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNzD+0AAoJELh1XLHFkqhai9QIAJSoSd+iGo/3QmZzVGc8Espk M5/jo+AaO68MGdLPTS/VlP6G0Y38IDiFEVdLNXx6w3Cnrtivn2EjufhHzGFFFfjB 9Mn3deAF5m21UFdR2ohnqpJLVdfWdCmNcJESVLcwRnWa4R8rrvMtlvEDbYG9DgRY NFJnRAfTNvZ0RYqE/UKHthycLrTklFhlSAV8xHkaCjEV+BF1Yu8pNvzaPOSLEylC KXfdAQu+68UQuzTC4S4Tvi1vOJupIQK27ewwC26pMOYTaoewSuhtntTprp1XvA6e mjDWxeBCNx5NXdH0LaNS4GWx77GlV7e1JTtHCljh/s0JSkMZO1WLOtGyl9T6u4s= =ty9t -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----