Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!talisker.lacave.net!lacave.net!not-for-mail From: 7stud -- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby Subject: Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:51:57 -0500 Organization: Service de news de lacave.net Lines: 16 Message-ID: <2f016f7e1eb6e5c88c2ad0a5d43683b0@ruby-forum.com> References: <52198c724199b47f9d59c43592238d37@ruby-forum.com> <26d555101380a80dba2c4c1f0f82ea08@ruby-forum.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bristol.highgroove.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: talisker.lacave.net 1303347134 63077 65.111.164.187 (21 Apr 2011 00:52:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@lacave.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:52:14 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: X-Received-From: This message has been automatically forwarded from the ruby-talk mailing list by a gateway at comp.lang.ruby. If it is SPAM, it did not originate at comp.lang.ruby. Please report the original sender, and not us. Thanks! For more details about this gateway, please visit: http://blog.grayproductions.net/categories/the_gateway X-Mail-Count: 381966 X-Ml-Name: ruby-talk X-Rubymirror: Yes X-Ruby-Talk: <2f016f7e1eb6e5c88c2ad0a5d43683b0@ruby-forum.com> Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.ruby:3282 Brian Candler wrote in post #994123: > Steve Klabnik wrote in post #994098: >> Naw, monads are actually really, really easy. They're just poorly >> explained... one day, they just clicked for me, and I can't believe it >> took >> me all this time to learn them. > > According to this doc, anybody could have invented monads: > > http://blog.sigfpe.com/2006/08/you-could-have-invented-monads-and.html I've looked at that before. I dropped out at the second diagram. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.