Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: candycanearter07 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.folklore.computers,comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Python (was Re: Recent history of vi) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 13:30:03 -0000 (UTC) Organization: the-candyden-of-code Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <10fc99s$309k$1@dont-email.me> <10fco97$6fc7$5@dont-email.me> <10fddvm$dsjl$3@dont-email.me> <10fig07$8oe$1@news.misty.com> <10fvcgr$3d6mu$1@paganini.bofh.team> <10g526s$3o78s$1@dont-email.me> <10ga7mg$7ph$3@news.misty.com> <10gekt9$39ian$4@dont-email.me> <10gfihn$3lshj$1@dont-email.me> <10gh6oj$83hq$8@dont-email.me> <10ghqrq$g7pg$1@dont-email.me> <693d5437$0$2499$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <10hl622$jeli$11@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 13:30:04 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9f177bc91c10d00a2444d7aaaf8c0a00"; logging-data="1257457"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+SdcxnZP1qio67GdpMtjtJmCTMdjFdXeWFgRka8ZDlAA==" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:njfwoMtHbpmphLn57PVXd03T/D8= X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]% b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA] wrote at 02:05 this Sunday (GMT): > On 13 Dec 2025 11:55:35 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > >> Everything else is just a lot of lies. They pretend it's not strongly >> typed, but in the real world you will only encounter a lot of issue if >> you believe that. > > Think about why both JavaScript and PHP need a “===” operator, while > Python does not. > > It’s because Python is strongly typed. I thought it was because JS was too liberal with type-casting to make things true, and the JS devs didn't want to break compatibility. >> ... there are a lot of libraries helping developers. > > Other languages have done that before. Why do you think Python has been > able to leapfrog every prior language in this regard? Perl had a lot of > libraries to its name (still does), and yet that no longer seems to be a > good enough reason to continue using Perl, simply because Python now does > it better. > > It’s because Python has such a strong core language on which to build > extensions. The libraries tend to make heavy use of this. It is quite nice, yeah. -- user is generated from /dev/urandom