Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.folklore.computers,comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Python (was Re: Recent history of vi) Date: 21 Dec 2025 04:25:26 GMT Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <10fddvm$dsjl$3@dont-email.me> <10fig07$8oe$1@news.misty.com> <10fvcgr$3d6mu$1@paganini.bofh.team> <10g526s$3o78s$1@dont-email.me> <10ga7mg$7ph$3@news.misty.com> <10gekt9$39ian$4@dont-email.me> <10gfihn$3lshj$1@dont-email.me> <10gh6oj$83hq$8@dont-email.me> <10ghqrq$g7pg$1@dont-email.me> <693d5437$0$2499$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <10hl622$jeli$11@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net WlAJp3CXjzQuDdrn2yQRKQJiju1wu/dMmMlRHFED15/7HWYXyH Cancel-Lock: sha1:JAJ6eOPuS6PpkyGrdSHRTHECGlc= sha256:Jhgc2OUY9TqVwRK2Y0BvjvwgO5CvKlSQBmuPwcH5dDs= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:79634 alt.folklore.computers:232747 comp.lang.python:197652 On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 10:12:49 +0000, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > I would say that although Python does have some aspects of strong > typing, it is mostly weakly typed. Type hints sort of address that. Like TypeScript there is a temptation to say 'foo: Any' to preserve duck typing.