Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!not-for-mail
From: Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: Floating point "g" format not stripping trailing zeros
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:33:16 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <mbln2c$9k5$1@reader1.panix.com>
References: <CAK291fpAycSecNuV6hDnVXK+rhB0CWJTAuC3BKNUz8B4aDg2kQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAK291fpKxW_V=yCvNHj9RRoEhC=i_DYJCa9-cbjxDwRwH4-KfQ@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.18715.1423784816.18130.python-list@python.org> <mbl04r$kb6$1@reader1.panix.com> <mailman.18731.1423846637.18130.python-list@python.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67-130-15-94.dia.static.qwest.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1423859596 9861 67.130.15.94 (13 Feb 2015 20:33:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:33:16 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Linux)
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:85657

On 2015-02-13, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> On 2015-02-12, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Hrvoje Nikšić <hniksic@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> {:.15g} is supposed to give 15 digits of precision, but with trailing
>>>> zeros removed.
>>>
>>> The doc says with "insignificant" trailing zeros removed, not all
>>> trailing zeros.
>>
>> Can somebody explain the difference between "significant" and
>> "insignificant" tailing zeros to somebody who barely passed his single
>> numerical methods class?  [Though I have, on occasion, had to tinker
>> with the innards of SW floating point libraries and could fish a
>> hardcopy of IEEE-754 out of a filing cabinet if needed.]
>
> Significant digits are within the precision of the calculation.
> Writing 1.230 indicates that the fourth digit is known to be zero.
> Writing 1.23 outside a context of exact calculation indicates that the
> fourth digit is unknown due to insufficient precision.

I knew that, but I was asking in the context of float/decimal's
formatting function.  I didn't realize that float and/or decimal had a
"significant digit" property, and therefore possess significant vs.
insignificant trailing zeros when represented in base-10.

-- 
Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! Mr and Mrs PED, can I
                                  at               borrow 26.7% of the RAYON
                              gmail.com            TEXTILE production of the
                                                   INDONESIAN archipelago?