Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: boB Stepp Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Is vars() the most useless Python built-in ever? Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 20:20:51 -0600 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <565cf141$0$1612$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de Xtnss9eZw/zzAw1OHjrFdgZ5e2YbPxqT257worH5Ns6w== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'received:209.85.223': 0.03; 'value,': 0.03; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'throw': 0.09; 'variables': 0.15; '"python': 0.16; 'from:addr:robertvstepp': 0.16; 'from:name:bob stepp': 0.16; 'hint:': 0.16; 'received:209.85.223.173': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:ever': 0.16; 'subject:most': 0.16; 'thread.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'looked': 0.16; 'string': 0.17; 'steve': 0.18; '2015': 0.20; 'referring': 0.22; 'trying': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; "doesn't": 0.26; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'depth': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'normally': 0.30; "i'd": 0.31; 'probably': 0.31; 'post': 0.31; 'useful': 0.33; 'problem': 0.33; "d'aprano": 0.33; 'reference,': 0.33; 'steven': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'nov': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'problem.': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'thought': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'subject:the': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; '30,': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'elsewhere': 0.66; 'here': 0.66; 'obvious': 0.76; '7:00': 0.84; 'pocket': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=w38KfJVVOcGqNzVVGcyK/rojW3tnK87zbSFFj0dKqps=; b=YPufad47OdRFq5SJr6U0HQwq2v1cGKMETEuu4sZKTkmOIEXoJ2+e/wcg9mrD6X2iQK UCU8eX5kcXUaBXDRex80IZfnKWoSZ+qZxf6GxeYjmk/trXJTFyzEprt3o/U4G7XavIYs SCmf7uBx3xBRlB1g4o3J+x14qhVS/Lqe8i0auqDcLz/zUScoWGWGKiupc4HKZwx8VKF+ lqBZrMa2s+tqh/BHQRYR6N70GTGOILPyt7KR3EYHsik39OovyXEWfazqf0t5NK+YmAsU PSI9Cw2OtilVma3LCJiZPB3qlt9YbLCxtE9fmnTbDvI9fMG+VyRrAMJyRRCyKmlvAkeL +UBA== X-Received: by 10.107.3.42 with SMTP id 42mr1292893iod.83.1449022851137; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 18:20:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <565cf141$0$1612$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:99843 On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > > Either way, vars() doesn't solve the problem. What problem does it solve? > I'm way out of my depth here (I normally post on Tutor, as Steve knows), but when I looked vars() up in Lutz's "Python Pocket Reference, 5th ed.", he ended his description of it with: "... Hint: useful for referring to variables in string formatting." This is probably something obvious to you, but I thought I'd throw it out there in case it's of any value, since I did not see this mentioned elsewhere in this thread. Just trying to learn more ... -- boB