Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'receives': 0.04; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'revision': 0.07; '(currently': 0.09; 'facts': 0.09; 'obsolete': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'jan': 0.12; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'repl': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'subject:Was': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'replace': 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'gives': 0.31; '2008,': 0.31; 'regular': 0.32; 'standards': 0.33; 'subject: (': 0.35; 'combination': 0.36; 'next': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'days': 0.60; 'ago,': 0.61; 'received:173': 0.61; 'subject:The': 0.64; 'due': 0.66; 'smith': 0.68; 'url:tinyurl': 0.69; 'article': 0.77; 'subject:have': 0.80; 'bare': 0.84; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Terry Reedy Subject: Re: Fortran (Was: The "does Python have variables?" debate) Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 14:31:11 -0400 References: <87tx91warf.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <85eh05cdjx.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <87ha50hagu.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <536b8411$0$29965$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <536b9308$0$29965$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <536bab23$0$29965$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-75-254-207.phlapa.fios.verizon.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 22 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1399746698 news.xs4all.nl 2978 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:51953 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:71262 On 5/10/2014 9:42 AM, Roy Smith wrote: > In article , > Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: >> Obsolete and Legacy? Fortran still receives regular standards updates >> (currently 2008, with the next revision due in 2015). > > Ars Technica article a couple of days ago, about Fortran, and what is > likely to replace it: What might *possibly* replace it. > > http://tinyurl.com/mr54p96 The article is deficient in that it ignores the 20-year-old combination of python with fortran and the facts that the combination gives fortran a repl loop and that this combination has already somewhat replaced bare fortran. -- Terry Jan Reedy