Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'syntax': 0.04; 'function,': 0.09; 'lookup': 0.09; 'optimizing': 0.09; 'received:151': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'eckhardt': 0.16; 'emanuele': 0.16; 'missing?': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:format': 0.16; 'bit': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'writes:': 0.31; 'alone': 0.33; 'but': 0.35; 'building': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'little': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'skip:p 20': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'che': 0.60; 'quando': 0.84; 'carries': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Lele Gaifax Subject: Re: percent faster than format()? Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:44:15 +0200 Organization: Nautilus Entertainments References: <51760754$0$29872$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.62.64.222 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:UKAgjZQ4Uq7f4yZFs746JlpyPBo= X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 28 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1366731853 news.xs4all.nl 2252 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37148 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:44191 Ulrich Eckhardt writes: > So again, why is one faster than the other? What am I missing? The .format() syntax is actually a function, and that alone carries some overload. Even optimizing the lookup may give a little advantage: >>> from timeit import Timer >>> setup = "a = 'spam'; b = 'ham'; c = 'eggs'" >>> t1 = Timer("'%s, %s and %s for breakfast' % (a, b, c)", setup) >>> t2 = Timer("'{}, {} and {} for breakfast'.format(a, b, c)", setup) >>> print(min(t1.repeat())) >>> print(min(t2.repeat())) >>> setup = "a = 'spam'; b = 'ham'; c = 'eggs'; f = '{}, {} and {} for breakfast'.format" >>> t3 = Timer("f(a, b, c)", setup) >>> print(min(t3.repeat())) 0.3076407820044551 0.44008257299719844 0.418146252995939 But building the call frame still takes its bit of time. ciao, lele. -- nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia. lele@metapensiero.it | -- Fortunato Depero, 1929.