Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'sys': 0.05; 'append': 0.07; 'column': 0.07; 'linear': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; '(although': 0.09; 'clock,': 0.09; 'dict': 0.09; 'rows': 0.09; '"create': 0.16; '100,': 0.16; 'arrays.': 0.16; 'col': 0.16; 'correctly,': 0.16; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'message-id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'numpy': 0.16; 'range(cols):': 0.16; 'received:84.93': 0.16; 'received:84.93.230': 0.16; 'row': 0.16; 'subject:array': 0.16; 'subject:looping': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'import': 0.21; 'this:': 0.23; 'script': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'arrays': 0.29; 'cat': 0.29; 'measure': 0.29; 'received:192.168.1.3': 0.29; 'searches': 0.29; 'performing': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'received:84': 0.32; 'print': 0.32; 'zero': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'hi,': 0.33; 'skip:d 20': 0.34; 'thanks': 0.34; 'faster': 0.35; 'doing': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'list.': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'skip:v 20': 0.37; 'data': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'instead': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'apply': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.63; 'satellite': 0.65; 'sum': 0.66; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.68; 'reply- to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'saving': 0.72; '100': 0.78; 'ras': 0.84; 'reply-to:addr:python.org': 0.84; 'subject:dic': 0.84; 'average': 0.93 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=asgw+FlV c=1 sm=1 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:17 a=AAvI7MrX_rgA:10 a=w7zqQIw9OgQA:10 a=ihvODaAuJD4A:10 a=OUOv7kDek9cA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=8AHkEIZyAAAA:8 a=nTz416_S3dcA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=p6VkuoU7oG5dqh5buRgA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:117 X-AUTH: mrabarnett:2500 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:09:52 +0100 From: MRAB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: looping in array vs looping in a dic References: <007b2d71-3355-4085-b84f-204834b2c8d0@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <007b2d71-3355-4085-b84f-204834b2c8d0@googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: python-list@python.org List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 99 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1348168201 news.xs4all.nl 6945 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54458 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:29567 On 2012-09-20 19:31, giuseppe.amatulli@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > I have this script in python that i need to apply for very large arrays (arrays coming from satellite images). > The script works grate but i would like to speed up the process. > The larger computational time is in the for loop process. > Is there is a way to improve that part? > Should be better to use dic() instead of np.ndarray for saving the results? > and if yes how i can make the sum in dic()(like in the correspondent matrix[row_c,1] = matrix[row_c,1] + valuesRaster[row,col] )? > If the dic() is the solution way is faster? > > Thanks > Giuseppe > > import numpy as np > import sys > from time import clock, time > > # create the arrays > > start = time() > valuesRaster = np.random.random_integers(0, 100, 100).reshape(10, 10) > valuesCategory = np.random.random_integers(1, 10, 100).reshape(10, 10) > > elapsed = (time() - start) > print(elapsed , "create the data") > > start = time() > > categories = np.unique(valuesCategory) > matrix = np.c_[ categories , np.zeros(len(categories))] > > elapsed = (time() - start) > print(elapsed , "create the matrix and append a colum zero ") > > rows = 10 > cols = 10 > > start = time() > > for col in range(0,cols): > for row in range(0,rows): > for row_c in range(0,len(matrix)) : > if valuesCategory[row,col] == matrix[row_c,0] : > matrix[row_c,1] = matrix[row_c,1] + valuesRaster[row,col] > break > elapsed = (time() - start) > print(elapsed , "loop in the data ") > > print (matrix) > If I understand the code correctly, 'matrix' contains the categories in column 0 and the totals in column 1. What you're doing is performing a linear search through the categories and then adding to the corresponding total. Linear searches are slow because on average you have to search through half of the list. Using a dict would be much faster (although you should of course measure it!). Try something like this: import numpy as np from time import time # Create the arrays. start = time() valuesRaster = np.random.random_integers(0, 100, 100).reshape(10, 10) valuesCategory = np.random.random_integers(1, 10, 100).reshape(10, 10) elapsed = time() - start print(elapsed, "Create the data.") start = time() categories = np.unique(valuesCategory) totals = dict.fromkeys(categories, 0) elapsed = time() - start print(elapsed, "Create the totals dict.") rows = 100 cols = 10 start = time() for col in range(cols): for row in range(rows): cat = valuesCategory[row, col] ras = valuesRaster[row, col] totals[cat] += ras elapsed = time() - start print(elapsed, "Loop in the data.") print(totals)