Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'statements': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'wrote': 0.14; '==========': 0.16; 'illusion': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:Unicode': 0.16; 'apps': 0.16; 'properly': 0.19; 'working.': 0.19; 'skip:n 60': 0.24; 'text,': 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'supposed': 0.32; 'quite': 0.32; 'could': 0.34; 'really': 0.36; 'useful': 0.36; 'expected': 0.38; 'generic': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'happen': 0.63; 'frank': 0.68; '100': 0.79; 'frustrating': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: "Frank Millman" Subject: Re: Unicode in Python Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 09:45:07 +0200 References: <0f253434-5e7d-4eea-88e1-7997fec2bd2d@googlegroups.com> <773afa7d-4b6d-4d67-8d40-ea90b335a1a2@googlegroups.com> <5357715c$0$11109$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <03bb12d8-93be-4ef6-94ae-4a02789aea2d@googlegroups.com> X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 197.87.30.40 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.4657 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4913 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 25 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1398498323 news.xs4all.nl 2879 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54970 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:70629 wrote in message news:03bb12d8-93be-4ef6-94ae-4a02789aea2d@googlegroups.com... > ========== > > I wrote once 90 % of Python 2 apps (a generic term) supposed to > process text, strings are not working. > > In Python 3, that's 100 %. It is somehow only by chance, apps may > give the illusion they are properly working. > It is quite frustrating when you make these statements without explaining what you mean by 'not working'. It would be really useful if you could spell out - 1. what you did 2. what you expected to happen 3. what actually happened Frank Millman