Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.021 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'explicitly': 0.05; 'duplicate': 0.07; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'assume': 0.14; '(k,': 0.16; 'charles': 0.16; 'dict': 0.16; 'dictionary,': 0.16; 'expected):': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'iteration': 0.16; 'keys:': 0.16; 'loop.': 0.16; 'sat,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'work,': 0.20; 'example': 0.22; 'separate': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'list:': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'gives': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'keys': 0.31; 'way?': 0.31; 'cases': 0.33; 'third': 0.33; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'list': 0.37; 'list.': 0.37; 'filter': 0.38; 'list,': 0.38; 'previous': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'delete': 0.39; 'changed': 0.39; 'easy': 0.60; 'entire': 0.61; 'simply': 0.61; 'save': 0.62; 'real': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'effectively': 0.66; '26,': 0.68; 'snapshot': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92; 'technique': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=NUpg8g9bRqN51bxtT2QlHTgDp/98lP4YBLT+bW6I/8Y=; b=p6S7ID6T9U2qhzp6DrBQUVJQ/EKrl+tVKhbSslExkX9N9GONBB8kl7GsnTHLYn5Jjp 3nprMRFmubBfpMNFrF4cr/i8YEjeR+mKjpY8AzpRXF0z+JIv3tKobtXkQAqcBDEzRx0d mfFeJ1ZNmgy7AlQvUfmx3GRSFzq4g23pC0PVpxg7TEY/mP8i5fcMfPT6CRGfHpjfc/ww /vw2Uh1eF9xoAeKv0fXLbsf0iCKCgTGe5BPtr3lv+CYWzJpRAgwKeahJk4iwc/iZxj/Z HVEsNLsTzXAejHvYQx/9244GDDO+OLln3ebONnYikL7H80SRPyTXRRxqR/UygV77po39 JGOA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.74.38 with SMTP id q6mr7586089vev.7.1398448853290; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:00:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <535AA12A.1030203@earthlink.net> References: <535AA12A.1030203@earthlink.net> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 04:00:53 +1000 Subject: Re: Proper deletion of selected items during map iteration in for loop From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 39 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1398448862 news.xs4all.nl 2939 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50623 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:70609 On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Charles Hixson wrote: > What is the proper way to delete selected items during iteration of a map? > What I want to do is: > > for (k, v) in m.items(): > if f(k): > # do some processing of v and save result elsewhere > del m[k] > > But this gives (as should be expected): > RuntimeError: dictionary changed size during iteration > In the past I've accumulated the keys to be deleted in a separate list, but > this time there are likely to be a large number of them, so is there some > better way? One easy way is to explicitly coalesce the items() view into a list: for k, v in list(m.items()): That would work, but you effectively duplicate your entire dictionary into a list. More likely, you should simply snapshot the keys: for k in list(m): # Your example code isn't using v, but I # assume the real code does v = m[k] if f(k): # as above del m[k] This and your previous technique of accumulating a delete-me list would be the two standard ways to filter a dictionary with a loop. (I say "with a loop" because there's a third way to filter a dictionary, and that's with a comprehension. But I don't know of a really clean way to save v elsewhere for the cases where the dict isn't keeping that key.) ChrisA