Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Erik Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: "Downloading" Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 23:37:26 +0000 Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <519af$565d03d9$d47876e2$19871@news.ziggo.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de YVR/ewZ4j1h6xKTmjdZD4Az3InnvI21c/toCsHWVqMjA== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.020 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'list?': 0.07; 'python': 0.10; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'invoked,': 0.16; 'received:84.93': 0.16; 'received:84.93.230': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'to:2**1': 0.21; 'transfers': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'initiated': 0.29; 'regardless': 0.31; 'received:84': 0.32; 'source': 0.33; 'traditional': 0.33; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.36; 'why': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'transfer': 0.73; 'to:name:python': 0.84 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=JN/GyJ+b c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=Ypmeq7T0cKALDUsRPCToMg==:117 a=Ypmeq7T0cKALDUsRPCToMg==:17 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=K1kCK-ZepvQ_XGdebZMA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=OlD6DrmKU6MA:10 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:99831 On 01/12/15 23:28, Ian Kelly wrote: > What about transfers that are initiated by neither? > > scp remote_host1:path/to/file remote_host2:path/to/destination Regardless of how the transfer is invoked, in traditional parlance the source uploads, the target downloads. Why is this on the Python list? ;) E.