Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:bug': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'translation': 0.12; '2.7': 0.14; 'fine.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:expression': 0.16; 'subject:possible': 0.16; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'correct': 0.29; 'raise': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'but': 0.35; 'whilst': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'skip:a 30': 0.61; 'received:109': 0.72 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Robin Becker Subject: possible bug in re expression? Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:30:45 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 109.174.168.73 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 19 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1398443459 news.xs4all.nl 2918 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46654 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:70602 Whilst translating some javascript code I find that this A=re.compile('.{1,+3}').findall(p) doesn't give any error, but doesn't manage to find the strings in p that I want len(A)==>0, the correct translation should have been A=re.compile('.{1,3}').findall(p) which works fine. should re.compile('.{1,+3}') raise an error? It doesn't on python 2.7 or 3.3. -- Robin Becker