Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.128 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.82; '*S*': 0.08; 'root': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'terms,': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; '-1.': 0.16; 'belongs': 0.16; 'engineering.': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'think.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'fri,': 0.33; 'maybe': 0.34; 'subject: (': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'even': 0.60; 'number,': 0.60; 'numbers': 0.61; 'real': 0.63; 'sum': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'electrical': 0.74; 'square': 0.74; 'upper': 0.74; '"j"': 0.84; 'edwards': 0.91; 'from.': 0.93; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=WtUSNTYeKSodoUArea6KUAKFc9mVBN0piabJLDSz+9k=; b=D5gi5W13vIpxyQ2Gw/oAZPRS9iL/CQPJE0VU6oaVb+bjlL4+OFh9qOxllzkaAAKvUN AL8nY20s63mooYYgpAN3qcXY7YCwg5a0rtbHIgsC5p8Ekn5j9yFQrDAGd9LlpnU1xCct 2LkY0nTBq0vYI8f855HHG/Jz54WZBLClU4fQLRJlFIZz8JPaKWQknqaTxkgUzeYxtEXT 6yXGmEF8mxUsin6YFA4VSLUFMmmzoaVaRH6dlmi4x9PVYbTkHAFlWKEoUcV1Artf3pyo /hdK4iYLo6duhQIsbGKW+vsOUeLiaDBe0Z71/awwI8wc7IukUvKHYV0H7yv6p9kEqa6x D5fA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.96.130 with SMTP id ds2mr14061286pbb.99.1381414801341; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 07:20:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 01:20:01 +1100 Subject: Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1381414810 news.xs4all.nl 15960 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:32888 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:56577 On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: > Nope. "i" is electical current (though it's more customary to use > upper case). "j" is the square root of -1. > >> and that hypercomplex numbers include i, j, k, and maybe even other >> terms, and I never understood where j comes from. Why is Python >> better for using j? > > Because that's the way we do it in electrical engineering. > Okay, so hold on a minute... a hypercomplex number is the sum of a real number, some electrical current, an imaginary number, and k? This belongs in the Izzet League, I think. ChrisA