Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.010 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; '(of': 0.07; "subject:' ": 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:Does': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:programming': 0.16; 'tape': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'programming': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'days,': 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'provided,': 0.31; 'testing.': 0.31; 'but': 0.35; 'minutes,': 0.36; 'done': 0.36; 'charset:us- ascii': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'bad': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'took': 0.61; 'kind': 0.63; 'us,': 0.73; 'paper': 0.75; 'heaven.': 0.84; 'working,': 0.84; 'discipline': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Dave Angel Subject: Re: Does Python 'enable' poke and hope programming? Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:58:28 +0000 (UTC) References: <6b1769f8-222b-4953-99c8-a1d73cec3d60@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 174.32.174.33 User-Agent: XPN/1.2.6 (Street Spirit ; Linux) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 19 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1375387128 news.xs4all.nl 15964 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40392 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:51763 CM wrote: > what now strikes me as a Very Bad Habit, which is "poke and hope" > (trial and error) programming (of several names this page provided, I kind of like that one): > I recall when a "compile" took up to two days, before we got the punched paper tape to begin testing. If we wanted to "poke", it was done in hex. Once we got a local assembler/linker up and working, and (incremental) turnarounds were under 5 minutes, we thought we were in heaven. But the discipline of having to think it through was very good for us, in the long run. -- DaveA