Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.040
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'agree,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'underlying': 0.09; 'accident.': 0.16; 'kern': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'refactoring': 0.16; 'robert,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'regardless': 0.21; 'interpret': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'no,': 0.29; 'sense': 0.31; 'point': 0.31; 'problem': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'path': 0.35; 'robert': 0.35; 'next': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'except': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'method': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'easier': 0.38; 'gives': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'personally': 0.61; 'respect': 0.63; 'world': 0.63; 'our': 0.65; 'choose': 0.65; 'believe': 0.69; '(based': 0.84; 'eco': 0.84; 'terrible': 0.84; 'received:86': 0.93
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: python-list@python.org
From: Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Web Frameworks Excessive Complexity
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:33:46 +0000
References: <DUB117-W665C7556168028384DCC6791550@phx.gbl>, , <k8glsd$vfk$1@ger.gmane.org>, <DUB117-W66187DFCFCCDBA9E2710E091550@phx.gbl>, <k8gnuo$iln$1@ger.gmane.org> <DUB117-W75B7A8A9E5A70EBD07E8B491550@phx.gbl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc24-cmbg15-2-0-cust204.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
In-Reply-To: <DUB117-W75B7A8A9E5A70EBD07E8B491550@phx.gbl>
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.92.1353443639.29569.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 16
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1353443639 news.xs4all.nl 6882 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:49765
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:33656

On 20/11/2012 20:22, Andriy Kornatskyy wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> I respect your point of view and it definitely make sense to me. I personally do not have a problem to understand CC but agree, method LoC is easier to understand. Regardless the path your choose in your next refactoring (based on method CC, LoC) it gives your better product.

No, refactoring based on CC does not give you a better product, except by accident.

-- 
Robert Kern

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
  that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
  an underlying truth."
   -- Umberto Eco