Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.117 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.77; '*S*': 0.01; 'x86': 0.07; 'mostly': 0.14; 'competent': 0.16; 'with?': 0.16; 'subject:python': 0.16; 'prevent': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'machine': 0.22; 'software.': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'said,': 0.30; 'statement': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'fri,': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'depends': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'above,': 0.60; 'ian': 0.60; 'different': 0.65; 'anything.': 0.68; 'protect': 0.79; 'business.': 0.80; 'from.': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=jeJzN79Av/0eFboUrYuHPFr7G45P3TVcJHB0CT1y8GU=; b=fharMNU1vbYCbrjlLWYgijkHRnvwSH4k8ARnKveygtOJlbF8RwFFgjs2uqecYrkbgG pqgYYo6dCCZ+DDwVoXObguS/0HCnVxFFaPbPNe50i9VJxsxUpzlnWA3zi+z/WLQPD6Ko t6YYRppsbDg2zYsdyi/6pQ2zcZutbXaXXuCPDt/FzJAAwxwwU0ZQA11zJjahvRZSV58q xVDwlAy7QTInFbB2j1Lsd2R3owAscn1a2jXt0+Ktb2LLs/NyvwHCXJMe/cCLvJ0XS/uG QIyqhg9K6En2HkLIiqXoPH2TKnqiTjIm83shxDCvecBxLNTKE9LsmmwgpcvdVTe9oaEO NhLw== X-Received: by 10.66.160.34 with SMTP id xh2mr26039352pab.109.1397211809567; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 03:23:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <919121451418900428.100110sturla.molden-gmail.com@news.gmane.org> References: <572b740c-0ce2-4c01-a4cd-30d2e2463f2b@googlegroups.com> <919121451418900428.100110sturla.molden-gmail.com@news.gmane.org> From: Ian Kelly Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 04:22:49 -0600 Subject: Re: python obfuscate To: Python Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1397211813 news.xs4all.nl 2875 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45523 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:70119 On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:17 AM, Sturla Molden wrote: > Ian Kelly wrote: > >> The only reliable way to prevent a customer from reverse-engineering >> your software is to not give them the software. > > Not really... On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:17 AM, Sturla Molden wrote: > It depends on the threat and how competent persons you want to protect your > code from. If this comes from your boss, chances are he does not know that > even x86 machine code can be decompiled. So as many has said, this is > mostly futile business. The only way to protect your code is never to ship > anything. How is that last statement different from the one I made above, that you disagreed with?