Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.010 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; '1:48': 0.16; 'kernels,': 0.16; 'less,': 0.16; 'reason.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'windows?': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'issue.': 0.22; 'creating': 0.23; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'mon,': 0.24; '(or': 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints- To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'unix': 0.29; 'another': 0.32; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'expensive': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'major': 0.40; 'new': 0.61; 'become': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'smith': 0.68; 'maybe,': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Sturla Molden Subject: Re: threading Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 21:41:40 +0200 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 39-82-11.connect.netcom.no User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1396986111 news.xs4all.nl 2831 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:58639 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:69897 On 07/04/14 05:56, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Roy Smith wrote: >> There is (or at least, was) another reason. Creating a new process used >> to be far more expensive than creating a new thread. In modern Unix >> kernels, however, the cost difference has become much less, so this is >> no longer a major issue. > > Unix maybe, but what about Windows? Is it efficient to create > processes under Windows? Processes are very heavy-weight on Windows. Sturla