Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.012 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; '1:48': 0.16; 'enough.': 0.16; 'kernels,': 0.16; 'less,': 0.16; 'reason.': 0.16; 'received:gateway13.websitewelcome.com': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'windows?': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'issue.': 0.22; 'creating': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'mon,': 0.24; '(or': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'unix': 0.29; 'concern': 0.31; 'another': 0.32; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'performance': 0.37; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'expensive': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'major': 0.40; 'new': 0.61; 'received:173': 0.61; 'become': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'received:69.56': 0.68; 'smith': 0.68; 'maybe,': 0.84 Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:09:57 -0700 From: Ethan Furman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: threading References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator3304.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - python.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 173.12.184.238 X-Exim-ID: 1WXaT8-0008Uo-HM X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: ([10.1.10.12]) [173.12.184.238]:54972 X-Source-Auth: ethan+stoneleaf.us X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3IzMzA0Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20= X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 15 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1396981931 news.xs4all.nl 2968 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50661 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:69896 On 04/06/2014 08:56 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Roy Smith wrote: >> There is (or at least, was) another reason. Creating a new process used >> to be far more expensive than creating a new thread. In modern Unix >> kernels, however, the cost difference has become much less, so this is >> no longer a major issue. > > Unix maybe, but what about Windows? Is it efficient to create > processes under Windows? Not a concern until performance is not good enough. -- ~Ethan~