Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; '(at': 0.03; 'that?': 0.05; 'permissions': 0.07; 'c/c++': 0.09; 'rebuild': 0.09; 'subject:still': 0.09; 'windows,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'subject:python': 0.11; '(last': 0.16; '-tkc': 0.16; 'decent': 0.16; 'development?': 0.16; 'finney': 0.16; 'from:addr:python.list': 0.16; 'from:addr:tim.thechases.com': 0.16; 'from:name:tim chase': 0.16; 'greatness': 0.16; 'message- id:@tim.thechases.com': 0.16; 'received:70.251': 0.16; 'received:dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net': 0.16; 'received:rcsntx.swbell.net': 0.16; 'received:swbell.net': 0.16; 'ssh': 0.16; 'window;': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'subject:need': 0.17; 'shell': 0.18; 'input': 0.18; 'windows': 0.19; 'sort': 0.21; 'together.': 0.21; '(usually': 0.22; 'keyboard': 0.22; 'location,': 0.22; 'machine.': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'programming': 0.23; 'work.': 0.23; 'somebody': 0.23; "haven't": 0.23; "i've": 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'feature': 0.24; 'so.': 0.24; 'allows': 0.25; 'least': 0.25; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; '(which': 0.26; '(most': 0.27; '(such': 0.27; 'mind.': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; 'run': 0.28; 'factor': 0.29; 'horizontal': 0.29; 'once.': 0.29; 'parties,': 0.29; 'quiet': 0.29; 'remotely': 0.29; 'vertical': 0.29; 'writes:': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'connection': 0.30; 'usually': 0.30; 'connections': 0.30; 'window': 0.30; 'primary': 0.30; 'goes': 0.33; 'curious': 0.33; 'programming,': 0.33; 'monitor': 0.33; 'text': 0.34; 'screen': 0.34; 'needed': 0.35; 'ben': 0.35; 'especially': 0.35; 'offered': 0.35; 'remote': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'similar': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'ability': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'skip:{ 10': 0.36; 'editor': 0.37; 'one,': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'subject:New': 0.37; 'rather': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'sure': 0.38; 'application': 0.40; 'where': 0.40; 'skip:" 10': 0.40; 'end': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'subject:, ': 0.61; 'back': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'notified': 0.65; 'offer': 0.65; 'broadcast': 0.65; 'watching': 0.65; 'finally': 0.66; 'teaching': 0.66; 'believe': 0.69; 'century': 0.84; 'keystrokes': 0.84; 'much,': 0.84; 'received:50.22': 0.84; 'subject:good': 0.84; 'windows)': 0.84; 'this;': 0.91; 'silent': 0.95 Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:59:23 -0600 From: Tim Chase User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anssi Saari Subject: Re: New to python, do I need an IDE or is vim still good enough? References: <50e186a2$0$6951$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - boston.accountservergroup.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - python.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tim.thechases.com Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 63 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1357318698 news.xs4all.nl 6979 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42323 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:36121 On 01/04/13 01:34, Anssi Saari wrote: > Ben Finney writes: >> And any decent Unix-alike (most OSen apart from Windows) comes with its >> own IDE: the shell, a good text editor (Vim or Emacs being the primary >> candidates), and a terminal multiplexor (such as ‘tmux’ or GNU Screen). > > Just curious since I read the same thing in a programming book recently > (21st century C). So what's the greatness that terminal multiplexors > offer over tabbed terminals? Especially for software development? > > For sure I use screen at the remote end of ssh connections where I don't > want the application like irssi to die if the connection goes down but > other than that? The reattaching is a nice feature--especially since you can start some work in one location, then SSH into the box remotely and reattach, resuming where you left off. Other nice things include - if it's a remote machine, only connecting once. This is more a factor if you need to enter a password, rather than using passwordless public/private key auth. But even with passwordless key-pairs, you still have to type "ssh user@host" rather than "{prefix key}c" to create a new connection on the same machine. - the ability to monitor windows for activity/silence (at least GNU Screen offered this; I haven't dug for it yet in tmux which I'm learning). This is nice for backgrounding a compile and being notified when it goes silent (usually means it's done) or watching a long-running quiet process to get notification when it finally has some output. I used this feature a LOT back when I did C/C++ work. - both offer the ability to do screen-sharing with other parties, as well as granting them various permissions (user X can watch but not interact with the session, while user Y can issue commands to the terminal as well) which is nice for remotely pair programming, or teaching somebody the ropes or troubleshooting. - depending on your tabbed terminal windows, terminal multiplexors usually offer some split-screen abilities (last I checked, GNU Screen only offered horizontal splits; tmux had both vertical & horizontal splits). As a Vim user (which doesn't have a way to include a terminal window inside Vim unless you rebuild it with unofficial patches), this allows me to have an editor in one {screen|tmux} window and a shell in the other and be able to see them together. I don't use it much, but it's nice to have when I do need it. - tmux offers the ability to transmit keyboard input to all linked/synchronized windows, so you can connect to multiple servers and then issue the same commands and they get run across all of them. I believe Screen offers a similar ability to broadcast keystrokes to all windows, but with a clunkier interface. Sort of a poor-man's "clusterssh". I've not needed this one, but it's there in case you manage clusters or develop/deploy with them. Those are just a few of the things that come to mind. Some might be replicated by a tabbed terminal window; others less so. -tkc