Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Anthony Papillion Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: [SOLVED] There has to be a better way to split this string! Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:40:21 -0600 Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <56BA91B5.5090400@cajuntechie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de XVv+/7lH1E3ZwCBMYcGlDQ9TWM78S+Njl1f6XnHkPIcw== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.009 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.03; 'ugly': 0.07; 'filename.': 0.09; 'subject:string': 0.09; 'everyone,': 0.15; 'from:addr:anthony': 0.16; 'help?': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:There': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'subject:] ': 0.19; 'replacing': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'skip:m 30': 0.27; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.30; 'anyone': 0.32; "can't": 0.32; 'returned': 0.32; 'file': 0.34; 'received:10.0': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'received:10': 0.37; 'seem': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'version': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'received:10.0.2': 0.84; 'ugly,': 0.84; 'subject:this': 0.85 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 In-Reply-To: <56BA91B5.5090400@cajuntechie.org> X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21rc2 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:102745 On 02/09/2016 07:26 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I am using datetime.now() to create a unique version of a filename. > When the final file is named, it will look something like: > > myfile-2015-02-09-19-08-45-4223 > > Notice I'm replacing all of the "."'s, " "'s, and ":"'s returned by > datetime.now() with "-"'s. I'm doing that using the following code but > it's freaking ugly and I KNOW there is a better way to do it. I just > can't seem to think of it right now. Can anyone help? What is the > "right", or at least, less ugly, way to do this task? Found the solution in strftime(). Exactly what I was looking for.