Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'example:': 0.03; 'guido': 0.03; 'parameter': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'nasty': 0.07; 'tab': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'arguments,': 0.09; 'am,': 0.12; 'def': 0.13; '"python': 0.15; '(besides': 0.16; 'cliff': 0.16; 'confusing.': 0.16; 'declaration,': 0.16; 'metaclass': 0.16; 'naming': 0.16; 'simplest': 0.16; 'subject:classes': 0.16; 'x-mailer:evolution 2.32.3': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'exists.': 0.18; 'seems': 0.20; 'cheers,': 0.20; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'implicit': 0.23; 'way?': 0.23; 'defined': 0.24; 'classes': 0.26; 'function': 0.27; 'cc:addr:gmail.com': 0.28; 'explicitly': 0.29; 'class': 0.29; 'example': 0.29; 'problem': 0.29; 'skip:b 20': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'depth': 0.30; 'url:2008': 0.30; 'ago': 0.31; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'actually': 0.31; 'thu,': 0.32; 'idea': 0.32; "isn't": 0.33; 'there': 0.33; 'agree': 0.33; 'discussed': 0.34; 'steven': 0.34; 'done': 0.34; 'crazy': 0.34; 'google': 0.35; 'cc:2**1': 0.36; 'received:org': 0.36; 'issue': 0.37; 'reasons': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'using': 0.37; 'skip:_ 10': 0.38; 'received:192': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'initially': 0.39; 'cannot': 0.39; 'missing': 0.40; 'url:blogspot': 0.61; 'your': 0.61; 'saw': 0.66; 'url:10': 0.72; '10:51': 0.84; '13:15': 0.84; 'andrea': 0.84; 'self.': 0.84; 'trick,': 0.84 Subject: Re: Python classes: Simplify? From: "J. Cliff Dyer" To: Andrea Crotti In-Reply-To: <4F6B25D7.9020002@gmail.com> References: <4F6B25D7.9020002@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:12:32 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: python-list@python.org, Steven Lehar X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 67 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1332439969 news.xs4all.nl 6905 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37951 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:22036 The issue of explicitly naming a "self" parameter has been discussed in depth on a number of occasions. I recommend a google search for "python implicit self" for some of the reasons why it exists. Here's what Guido has to say about it: http://neopythonic.blogspot.com/2008/10/why-explicit-self-has-to-stay.html Cheers, Cliff On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 13:15 +0000, Andrea Crotti wrote: > On 03/22/2012 10:51 AM, Steven Lehar wrote: > > It seems to me that the Python class system is needlessly confusing. > > Am I missing something? > > > > > > For example in the class Complex given in the documentation > > > > > > class Complex: > > def __init__(self, realpart, imagpart): > > self.r = realpart > > self.i = imagpart > > > > > > x = Complex(3.0, -4.5) > > > > > > I initially found it profoundly confusing that __init__( ) calls for > > 3 arguments, but you call Complex( ) with 2. Furthermore, why not > > call the initialization function after the class name as is done in > > other languages? Isn't that the simplest conceptually? Demonstrating > > with the above example: > > > > > > class Complex: > > def Complex(realpart, imagpart): > > Complex.r = realpart > > Complex.i = imagpart > > > > > > x = Complex(3.0, -4.5) > > > > > > Is there a good reason why classes cannot be defined that way? > > (Besides the problem of backward-compatibility) > > > > > > Some time ago I saw some nasty hack that allowed you to drop the self > in the method declaration, > using some crazy metaclass trick, but that's really not a good idea ;) > > I agree that is counter-intuitive but just set your editor to do that > for you and you will be fine.. > > in my emacs > - s TAB -> self > - . TAB -> self. > - m TAB -> def ${1:method}(self$2): > $0 > > so I never actually write the self..