Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.009 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'vast': 0.09; 'subject:How': 0.10; 'python': 0.11; 'language.': 0.14; '__future__': 0.16; 'bern': 0.16; 'parentheses': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'all.': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; 'examples': 0.20; 'import': 0.22; 'print': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; '---': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'chris': 0.29; 'statement': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; "i'd": 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'being': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'subject:can': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'skip:p 20': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'free': 0.61; 'viruses': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'show': 0.63; 'protection': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; 'antivirus': 0.68; 'subject:this': 0.83; '4:29': 0.84; 'received:2': 0.84; 'was:': 0.91; 'incredibly': 0.96 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: How can I parse this correctly? Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 12:32:21 +0100 References: <7E623349-4095-4550-9E2F-D7261C311DBE@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-2-98-192-106.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140406-0, 06/04/2014), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 37 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1396783966 news.xs4all.nl 2865 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46171 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:69762 On 06/04/2014 09:17, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote: >> No particular reason at all. I've Bern dabbling in Python for the last bit >> and am just writing code based on the samples or examples I'm finding. What >> was the tipoff that this was not Python 3? Would there be a large difference >> in this code if it was Python 3? > > The tip-off was that you have no parentheses around print's arguments. > Behold the vast difference that told me which it was: > > # Python 2: print is a statement > print int(row['YEAR']) > > # Python 3: print is a function > print(int(row['YEAR'])) > > So incredibly different :) But it's enough to show that you're on Python 2. > > ChrisA > I'd recommend using this import statement in Python 2 so you get used to print being a function. from __future__ import print_function -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com