Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Emile van Sebille Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:56:43 -0800 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <87d1v5emhl.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <564e6a62$0$1620$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <565592e9$0$1615$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de YJitnEckZi1TY2V0umLjEguzp96RkLPMjtkhQeWP2mZQ== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.018 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'true,': 0.04; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject: \n ': 0.15; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:?)': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'am,': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'skip:i 40': 0.27; 'certainly': 0.30; 'clear': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'manual': 0.38; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'software': 0.40; 'provide': 0.61; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'training': 0.78; 'received:12': 0.81; 'courses,': 0.84; 'lucrative': 0.93 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: www.westernstatesglass.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:99479 On 11/25/2015 5:20 AM, BartC wrote: > it seems to be more lucrative to write thicker user manuals, and provide > longer training courses, than to make software simpler. If that were true, certainly by now the sufficiently thick manual would provide crystal clear explanations. :) I-don't-think-obfustication-is-the-point-ly y'rs, Emile