Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.unit0.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Chris Angelico Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Don't put your software in the public domain Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 22:04:02 +1000 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <574ef865$0$1618$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <57501efe$0$1583$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de gfO35sqL20KlCnfhFMre5QemzO2qk+7YZ2GKocIcVljA== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.019 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'anyway.': 0.04; 'that?': 0.05; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'subject:software': 0.09; ':-)': 0.12; 'subsequent': 0.15; 'thu,': 0.15; '2016': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'gregory': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:domain': 0.16; 'url:faq': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '>>>': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'prevent': 0.20; 'explicit': 0.22; 'written': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'actual': 0.28; 'subject:public': 0.29; 'code': 0.30; 'putting': 0.30; "d'aprano": 0.33; 'steven': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'could': 0.35; 'possible,': 0.35; 'received:74.125.82': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'why': 0.39; 'subject:the': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'close': 0.61; 'real': 0.62; 'granted': 0.63; 'license': 0.65; 'experts.': 0.66; "they're": 0.66; 'subject:your': 0.75; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'domain,': 0.84; 'lawyer': 0.84; 'ruled': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91; 'subject:Don': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc; bh=6WUfcmcXjCDrGoaSmietXoRHf4JGZFhsvUgDxNC/Uzg=; b=oKMNCCGIUPvjrNg/e+9VZyLKbeLq5Ceix9+EW8ExfFWFdp2IcLuRBVDoWsqPN8GCMY W7c6k1bXoG3/w6enLytsQjD3+ke8z3Zgb0GHsck4RwlKRLbiVBZToC+OAZx0ebM5p3E/ uR5Bs/3f9C+yH6/xNc9h5PPPfeTY5ksiEm4KQT63reBZDbfsmbyClx9QH/IUgbeTg4P2 Te3mb/71R9+g8kvngBML8r6hgJG8tZxNiyDVDYaNiZ2smspdT9lkXvUtiBWFa41PLyNh xMeUrHXzXxDFgtHHRjjl7xxDnzawn4RRAaJJTa9B51En4EsdjiebRwthRmTgp15MeHc8 WXSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:cc; bh=6WUfcmcXjCDrGoaSmietXoRHf4JGZFhsvUgDxNC/Uzg=; b=hfxyY1af8skV67usX90cnAptHQaX2Vg5+cvGAezKvIkCKbz9RbDcvGAYTjBKVO/1CH gq53JSaeVeDcwM24miOmDAr8KkndD+4ohCJYv0Kw68d4PlTot6S6wr6Y5TZVxAA7bzxe 3kIzlDafO+Zg5sFemCJnl3a2or7pB6cq1RMBaze2Zwp7f3CvvcdFDRx7ZhJddUOaEFIT Dda+Di1sZ/mVKdvuC+Dm2wBk4UrZ/D+8ciVgjzeAnKZUdjxiqTHxpsGTzWmcG0L1fBcV VnmSX+KUkGRJ0fjdWb6CD2HTfkQuDbpFBdTnJvsV4gjr7MOKeDCE1pxpIpeurGXeRleh g7rA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKyMLbMLLi/SedW8AGUHQQxm6NTx8r5NmSDhH6UOLcPD8vnK9veIn4mCtzTnnYcSpj3rWbavbxXnGH2DQ== X-Received: by 10.28.44.87 with SMTP id s84mr8213543wms.61.1464869042178; Thu, 02 Jun 2016 05:04:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57501efe$0$1583$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: <574ef865$0$1618$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <57501efe$0$1583$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:109357 On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 04:41 pm, Gregory Ewing wrote: > >> Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> >>> http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Licensing_and_Law/public-domain.html >> >> From that: >>> It might be ruled to create a global licence for unrestricted use. That >> > licence might or might not then be adjudicated to be revocable by >> > subsequent copyright owners (heirs, divorcing spouses, creditors). >> >> If that's possible, then could said heirs, divorcing spouses >> and creditors also revoke supposedly permanent rights granted >> under an explicit licence? Or is putting the word "irrevocable" >> in the licence enough to prevent that? > > Ask a real lawyer :-) > > This is why we should use licences that have been written and vetted by > actual lawyers. They're the experts. I honestly don't see why people want to put their code into the public domain, when the MIT license is pretty close to that anyway. What's the point? ChrisA