Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed0.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.83.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.041 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'static': 0.04; 'position,': 0.05; 'subject:query': 0.07; 'assuming': 0.09; 'here?': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'assume': 0.14; '>>': 0.16; 'acted': 0.16; 'equations': 0.16; 'initially,': 0.16; 'itself,': 0.16; 'opposite': 0.16; 'quantum': 0.16; 'relevant.': 0.16; 'all.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'looked': 0.18; 'seems': 0.21; '>>>': 0.22; 'email addr:gmail.com>': 0.22; 'shell': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'progress.': 0.24; 'subject:Code': 0.24; 'initial': 0.24; "haven't": 0.24; 'environment': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; '>': 0.26; 'train': 0.26; 'subject:/': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'on,': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'properties': 0.29; 'needed.': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'url:mailman': 0.30; "skip:' 10": 0.31; 'url:wiki': 0.31; '>>>>': 0.31; 'assumes': 0.31; 'constant': 0.31; 'publicly': 0.31; 'says': 0.33; 'url:python': 0.33; '(2)': 0.35; 'case,': 0.35; 'equal': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'object,': 0.36; 'url:listinfo': 0.36; 'similar': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'level': 0.37; 'starting': 0.37; 'skip:& 10': 0.38; '(3)': 0.38; '8bit%:4': 0.38; 'question,': 0.38; 'stopped': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'environment.': 0.39; 'moving': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'ian': 0.60; 'medical': 0.61; 'simply': 0.61; 'show': 0.63; 'maximum': 0.63; 'reached': 0.63; 'skip:n 10': 0.64; 'our': 0.64; 'movement': 0.65; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'due': 0.66; 'latest': 0.67; 'between': 0.67; 'physics': 0.68; 'increase': 0.74; 'other.': 0.75; 'dimensional': 0.84; 'heh.': 0.84; 'regain': 0.84; 'travels': 0.84; 'reasons,': 0.91; '<>*': 0.95; 'traveling': 0.96 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=M3m+j1+QSI5IhTce8qXgrQsVCZxlHBBSF4OLQh8BgnI=; b=T52593SUp10D6s7YYPdGDzXwnY/x4UABBXj7IL+rFbwRfXQD10A/BxENahhOCMzuc2 DpH54Z/6w7C8ZuzJPL77GSVvAP+fcKC7G7tBkZX17xS+J55NVzt6+e/TytFlhBkdfjlB nbYSjtXDWLlLqNCztJzuZiR4edSFGdHJcmzx3lFZ59rmKd2uhUey7sQqDjnzLdNDdK41 o9lvS2pB/wE67dIbny5ZgQziNA3KTWlMxmSTJ/wyrlhbjh0ckqnwWdHN6eHTEMzTmF/t ZCD4F1aFLU4amifiIoVYu4V7ceXZRMJaGACxChQ/EVqtwX4OYgZFGxnAJhq0HClP1ayX 51Pw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.11.132 with SMTP id t4mr33785039qat.4.1396338392267; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:46:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <533a3fd8$0$2909$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 03:46:32 -0400 Subject: Re: Code style query: multiple assignments in if/elif tree From: David Hutto To: Ian Kelly Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2c20adb813104f5f65dab Cc: Python X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 290 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1396338394 news.xs4all.nl 2887 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45519 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:69485 --001a11c2c20adb813104f5f65dab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Notice that it says that laymans say it has a small state in progress, instead of a large state of 'progress'...that's arrogance, it's just the fact that it has a Vo->V1 state of progress. My question, which I haven't looked up the latest research on, is does it have the conservation of momentum, in which during the time frames that can be sampled in hertz, as it transitions to the higher shell level , and do those timeframes increase or decrease in relation to the eV(electron volts) applied? On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:39 AM, David Hutto wrote: > The link isn't to prove my ideology of what happens, it to show what you > might be thinking about, instead of how I feel about it...nth dimensional > dynamics/hyperspace taken out. Been out of this for a while due to medical > reasons, but try to keep up on the latest measurements/accumulated data > with today's(what has been publicly released) manufacturing levels. > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:34 AM, David Hutto wrote: > >> You would be assuming a quantum leap type theory, that the object has no >> Vo->V1, it just adjusts to the constant immediately, instead of what I >> would call the quantum leap,without other 'theories' involved, that it has >> a classical physics type movement in which it can accelerate from a resting >> position, to a velocity, and then regain orbit: >> >> http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_a_quantum_leap >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:21 AM, David Hutto wrote: >> >>> u is the initial velocity from a starting/resting point, not a static >>> speed at that point, and begins to accelerate, >>> over a particular timeframe, in which it's momentum is not stopped by >>> friction on which the rails/environment it travels upon has, or the similar >>> properties the object might have during acceleration in relation to the >>> environment it travels within. >>> >>> So the object has a starting point at which there is no equal, or >>> opposing force, as it begins to accelerate from a resting position(Newton: >>> an object will remain in motion, until acted upon by an equal or opposite >>> force, and in this case the motion is propulsion of the object, or the >>> newtons of propulsion, until it is moving at the exact speed of the >>> propulsion applied to the object->Vo-V1, with 0 friction/viscosity during >>> this timeframe). >>> >>> The difference in our opinions, seems to be that there is an initial >>> resting state, and not at an already accelerated motion that has reached >>> it's maximum capacity. >>> >>> >>> So there is a dynamic in my mind's eye, where the object is at a >>> "resting" point initially, and either the environment, or the object can >>> maneuver their own viscosity in relation to the other. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Ian Kelly wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:24 AM, David Hutto >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> >> (1) v = u + at >>>> >> >> (2) s = 1/2(u + v)t >>>> >> >> (3) s = ut + 1/2(at^2) >>>> >> >> (4) v^2 = u^2 + 2as >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Only (1) and (3) are needed. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Okay, what's u here? Heh. >>>> >> >>>> >> u is the initial velocity; v is the velocity after accelerating at a >>>> for >>>> >> time t. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > This assumes that the viscosity is in a state of superfluidity, and >>>> in a >>>> > perfect state between itself, and it's traveling environment. >>>> >>>> I fail to see how this is relevant. I would assume that the amount of >>>> friction is already modeled in the acceleration constants; if it were >>>> zero then the brakes would be nonfunctional and the train would not be >>>> able to accelerate or decelerate at all. In any case, a change in >>>> friction simply works out to a change in acceleration. The equations >>>> above still hold true. >>>> -- >>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, >>> David Hutto >>> *CEO:* *http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com >>> * >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> David Hutto >> *CEO:* *http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com >> * >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, > David Hutto > *CEO:* *http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com > * > -- Best Regards, David Hutto *CEO:* *http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com * --001a11c2c20adb813104f5f65dab Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Notice that it says that laymans say it has a small state = in progress, instead of a large state of 'progress'...that's ar= rogance, it's just the fact that it has a Vo->V1 state of progress. = My question, which I haven't looked up the latest research on, is does = it have the conservation of momentum, in which during the time frames that = can be sampled in hertz, as it transitions to the higher shell level , and = do those timeframes increase or decrease in relation to the eV(electron vol= ts)=A0applied?


On Tue, Apr 1= , 2014 at 3:39 AM, David Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com>= wrote:
The link isn't to = prove my ideology of what happens, it to show what you might be thinking ab= out, instead of how I feel about it...nth dimensional dynamics/hyperspace t= aken out.=A0Been out of this for a while due to medical reasons, but try to= keep up on the latest measurements/accumulated data with today's(what = has been publicly released)=A0manufacturing levels.

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:34 AM, David Hutt= o <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> wrote:
You would be assuming a quantum leap= type theory, that the object has no Vo->V1, it just adjusts to the cons= tant immediately, instead of what I would call the quantum leap,without oth= er 'theories' involved, that it has a classical physics type moveme= nt in which it can accelerate from a resting position, to a velocity, and t= hen regain orbit:



On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:21 AM, David Hu= tto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> wrote:
u is the initial velocity from a sta= rting/resting point, not a static speed at that point, and begins to accele= rate,
over a particular timeframe, in which it's momentum is not stopped= by friction on which the rails/environment it travels upon has, or the sim= ilar properties the object might have during acceleration in relation to th= e environment it travels within.

So the object has a starting point at which there is no= equal, or opposing force, as it begins to accelerate from a resting positi= on(Newton: an object will remain in motion, until acted upon=A0 by an equal= or opposite force, and in this case the motion is propulsion of the object= , or the newtons of propulsion, until it is moving at the exact speed of th= e propulsion applied to the object->Vo-V1, with 0 friction/viscosity dur= ing this timeframe).

The differe= nce in our opinions, seems to be that there is an initial resting state, an= d not at an already accelerated motion that has reached it's maximum ca= pacity.


<= div class=3D"gmail_extra">So there is a dynamic in my mind's eye, where= the object is at a "resting" point initially, and either the env= ironment, or the object can maneuver their own viscosity in relation to the= other.


On = Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:24 AM, David Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.= com> wrote:
>>
>> >> (1) v =3D u + at
>> >> (2) s =3D 1/2(u + v)t
>> >> (3) s =3D ut + 1/2(at^2)
>> >> (4) v^2 =3D u^2 + 2as
>> >>
>> >> Only (1) and (3) are needed.
>> >
>> > Okay, what's u here? Heh.
>>
>> u is the initial velocity; v is the velocity after accelerating at= a for
>> time t.
>
>
> This assumes that the viscosity is in a state of superfluidity, and in= a
> perfect state between itself, and it's traveling environment.

I fail to see how this is relevant. =A0I would assume that the amount= of
friction is already modeled in the acceleration constants; if it were
zero then the brakes would be nonfunctional and the train would not be
able to accelerate or decelerate at all. =A0In any case, a change in
friction simply works out to a change in acceleration. =A0The equations
above still hold true.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list



--
Best Regards,
David Hutto
CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com=



--
Best Regards,
David Hutto
<= b>CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com



--
Best Regard= s,
David Hutto
CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com



--
Best Regard= s,
David Hutto
CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com
--001a11c2c20adb813104f5f65dab--