Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.038 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'sufficient': 0.05; 'comment,': 0.09; 'question?': 0.09; 'received:mail- vc0-f174.google.com': 0.09; 'sep': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.10; 'thread': 0.11; '(now': 0.16; 'low.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'wondering': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'topic': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'argue': 0.29; 'context,': 0.29; 'high.': 0.29; 'received:209.85.220.174': 0.29; 'url:mailman': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'basic': 0.30; 'url:python': 0.32; 'url:listinfo': 0.32; 'goes': 0.33; 'says': 0.33; "can't": 0.34; 'agree': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'posting': 0.35; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'being': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'passed': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'far': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'talk': 0.38; 'instead': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; "you've": 0.61; 'more': 0.63; 'lack': 0.71; 'policy.': 0.71; 'around,': 0.84; 'furman': 0.84; 'neil': 0.84; 'ethan': 0.91; 'noise': 0.91; 'ratio': 0.91; 'incredibly': 0.96 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MHZscGE3wA0hUxkBml+6TxPf9Owzv05t+iMCyutW8So=; b=eQ7LVwJF3/LTLHAhHELlTkBWsWvOEtNw8CB91kYNTII/vny5oUSrGfL1cWBf4XmOto v7Vje1OQLimYEqMbUyXsT3O4cHVZrudSd4I8EBpY8ftCxRQc/mgHUlHlZ8Hp4Uo4hBab Rr1uVBELtvmyzMO3i+qkBTZgol8EOsLQ02L2o09WRelZcuNFYxrhUy2LJEn/mcwx9Nmj ya3PTnblHLky1dTHFxoN70NMEYo8YeMGkZI1PdeM1lj3T0xskVki5t/VaWJVCD3pLLqB Et6vRYEiLCYGyAwn25BWJhWR6zCvvJXeoKCJmbFOgJzu+q5jAR0UcNr4OIL6P1XDOIsV I5BA== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <50588F60.7090608@stoneleaf.us> References: <5B80DD153D7D744689F57F4FB69AF47416678A53@SCACMX008.exchad.jpmchase.net> <4cfea2fe-c0db-4c72-b1cb-ddef88f6e86d@wz4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <9280d4ca-b047-4896-bf7b-7cc4a728d721@sd5g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <5B80DD153D7D744689F57F4FB69AF4741667C1AD@SCACMX008.exchad.jpmchase.net> <50588F60.7090608@stoneleaf.us> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:55:41 -0400 Subject: Re: Comparing strings from the back? From: Dwight Hutto To: Ethan Furman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 44 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1347983744 news.xs4all.nl 6963 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38787 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:29436 On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Ethan Furman wrote: > Neil Hodgson wrote: >> >> Ethan Furman: >>> >>> *plonk* >> >> >> I can't work out who you are plonking. While more than one of the >> posters on this thread seem worthy of a good plonk, by not including >> sufficient context, you've left me feeling puzzled. Is there a guideline for >> this in basic netiquette? > > > You're right, my apologies. Dwight Hutto is the one I plonked. His signal > to noise ratio seems incredibly low. Is this just because of the lack of context, or because of the content of my response to the OP following the question? And with all the netiquette talk being passed around, why isn't this a new thread instead of hijacking the OP's original question, and engaging in bickering about netiquette that goes on all the time? And it seems redundant to argue this topic other than to comment, and let it pass, unless there's seems to be a legitimate reason why someone 'disobeyed' posting policy. > > alex23 can definitely be abrasive, but his ratio is high. > > (Now I'm wondering what that says about me as far as who I agree with and > why... I'll have to think about that.) > > ~Ethan~ > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list -- Best Regards, David Hutto CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com