Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.032 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'to:addr:pobox.com': 0.09; 'to:addr:skip': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'readable': 0.16; 'received:166.84': 0.16; 'received:166.84.1': 0.16; 'received:166.84.1.89': 0.16; 'received:24.136': 0.16; 'received:mailbackend.panix.com': 0.16; 'received:panix.com': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'received:166': 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'skip': 0.24; '---': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'post': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'received:24': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'am,': 0.29; 'subject: (': 0.35; "can't": 0.35; 'agree': 0.35; 'form.': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'format.': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'positive': 0.37; 'application': 0.37; 'days': 0.60; 'negative': 0.60; 'header :Message-Id:1': 0.63; 'mar': 0.68; '26,': 0.68; 'smith': 0.68; 'obvious': 0.74; '2014,': 0.84; 'email addr:panix.com': 0.84 Subject: Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Roy Smith In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 11:50:43 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <1102ec6b-6205-40f4-bb7c-d40f9d13115b@googlegroups.com> To: Skip Montanaro X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Cc: Python X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1395849055 news.xs4all.nl 2966 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50357 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:69133 On Mar 26, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote: > The point of my post was that there is no obvious one best way to > present negative timedeltas in a human readable form. I agree that there are a number of possible representations which might = make sense. But, using negative days and positive hours:minutes:seconds = is just bizarre. I can't think of any possible application where that = would be the desired format. --- Roy Smith roy@panix.com