Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'operator': 0.03; 'mrab': 0.05; 'root': 0.05; 'binary': 0.07; 'operator,': 0.09; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.11; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'negation': 0.16; 'subject:unicode': 0.16; 'unary': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; '(the': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'could': 0.34; 'no,': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'doing': 0.36; 'e.g.': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'mar': 0.68; '26,': 0.68; 'square': 0.74; 'to:none': 0.92 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g5BDWvG+ycnZwQB/WB76vIy+FIuaAE6n/RLrlp9Zc/Q=; b=ilhzVDxOzb2qtUOOVdVf1tU1YqfTQNmqz4D/yQrcfeHZq1kgLKKVSDTYyVx9eoA9Dn rJL4myBummrJ9RXhTnTdQuqPHgApQ6wQVJWv5hx0TLqGaaqkC0oXUAuvTcSrL9XJAMvq V7ALO9AJa+3WsPzDNQruStP58ofS498hWanKLCDljTaAs4vbuZlDPn2UpR/glrKwZZ3l qVZsWXnkEZktfB2f44lPYuKYRij+Wm4Or5UPAS87t1DRWBY2MNjyL3AjK3K7SU5MLWO/ Hhy4TbMQCPT9IwZr+GxWsTBTiGuIMBQoW2IcqPJc9EgyyWXrBYlTekAYcyJ69tqfEP6t SOcw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.142.201 with SMTP id ry9mr292019pab.14.1395803383212; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:09:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <533241C0.8020109@mrabarnett.plus.com> References: <5331D902.3030902@gmail.com> <53320793.8070501@stoneleaf.us> <533241C0.8020109@mrabarnett.plus.com> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:09:43 +1100 Subject: Re: unicode as valid naming symbols From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 10 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1395803386 news.xs4all.nl 2913 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41640 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:69098 On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:56 PM, MRAB wrote: >> No, it shouldn't. Doing so would mean we could not use =E2=88=9A as the= square >> root operator in the future. >> > Or as a root operator, e.g. 3 =E2=88=9A x (the cube root of x). Or both! It could be like unary negation and binary subtraction. ChrisA